Re: Architecture specific header files

2013-07-01 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 28.6.2013 15:04, Jakub Jelinek napsal(a): On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:58:12PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 25.6.2013 15:41, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Is there some common practice, where to place architecture specific header files? From output of the following command, I can't see any such pla

Re: Architecture specific header files

2013-06-28 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 28.6.2013 15:04, Jakub Jelinek napsal(a): On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:58:12PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 25.6.2013 15:41, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Is there some common practice, where to place architecture specific header files? From output of the following command, I can't see any such pla

Re: Architecture specific header files

2013-06-28 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:58:12PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 25.6.2013 15:41, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > >Is there some common practice, where to place architecture > >specific header files? From output of the following command, I > >can't see any such place. gcc doesn't have such location, yo

Re: Architecture specific header files

2013-06-28 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 25.6.2013 15:41, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Hi, Is there some common practice, where to place architecture specific header files? From output of the following command, I can't see any such place. $ `gcc -print-prog-name=cc1` -v ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-lin

Re: Architecture specific header files

2013-06-26 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 25.6.2013 22:37, Björn Persson napsal(a): Petr Pisar wrote: On 2013-06-25, Vít Ondruch wrote: Is there some common practice, where to place architecture specific header files? From output of the following command, I can't see any such place. I dont't think so. SDL moves architecture spec

Re: Architecture specific header files

2013-06-25 Thread Björn Persson
Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2013-06-25, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Is there some common practice, where to place architecture specific > > header files? From output of the following command, I can't see any > > such place. > > > I dont't think so. SDL moves architecture specific header file into > a priva

Re: Architecture specific header files

2013-06-25 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2013-06-25, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Is there some common practice, where to place architecture specific > header files? From output of the following command, I can't see any such > place. > I dont't think so. SDL moves architecture specific header file into a private directory: # Rename SDL_con