FYI,
ARPACK 3.0, featuring a soname bump, has been built in rawhide. If it
becomes necessary, I'll build the update in released branches as well.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, TASAKA Mamoru
wrote:
> Jussi Lehtola wrote, at 12/12/2011 03:46 AM +9:00:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Recently, a collaboration has picked up the pieces and started
>> maintaining a new fork of ARPACK [2].
>>
>
> AFAIK forking or renaming will always require new review request.
Jussi Lehtola wrote, at 12/12/2011 03:46 AM +9:00:
> Hi,
>
> Recently, a collaboration has picked up the pieces and started
> maintaining a new fork of ARPACK [2].
>
AFAIK forking or renaming will always require new review request.
e.g.
fork; util-linux -> util-linux-ng
https://bugzilla.redhat.co
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:41:13 +
José Matos wrote:
> On 12/11/2011 06:46 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > ARPACK used to be a project at Rice University [1], but they
> > abandoned it many years ago. After that many projects (e.g. Octave
> > and Scilab) started bundling their own patched versions of
On 12/11/2011 06:46 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> ARPACK used to be a project at Rice University [1], but they abandoned
> it many years ago. After that many projects (e.g. Octave and Scilab)
> started bundling their own patched versions of the software to fix the
> bugs they had found in th
