Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-20 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
On 7/20/22 13:48, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > (Sorry for the messed up line wrapping. I wanted to get this out.) > > Hi Jerry, > > On 22/07/06 08:13PM, Jerry James wrote: >> - golang-github-google-cel (eclipseo, @go-sig): needs the Go runtime >> from the antlr4-project package >> - golang-google

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-20 Thread Ben Beasley
On 7/19/22 21:59, Jerry James wrote: On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 8:13 PM Jerry James wrote: The various ANTLR packages will be impacted by https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs. These 3 packages are the only ones that have not been dealt with. These packages will fail the mass rebu

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-20 Thread Jerry James
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 11:48 AM Maxwell G wrote: > I'm replying as a member of the go-sig, as the primary maintainer is pretty > busy lately. > > At least 289 source packages (recursively) BuildRequire > golang-github-google-cel-devel[1]. Some of these packages only provide > `-devel` subpackages

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-20 Thread Maxwell G via devel
(Sorry for the messed up line wrapping. I wanted to get this out.) Hi Jerry, On 22/07/06 08:13PM, Jerry James wrote: > - golang-github-google-cel (eclipseo, @go-sig): needs the Go runtime > from the antlr4-project package > - golang-google-grpc (eclipseo, @go-sig): needs > golang-github-google-ce

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-19 Thread Jerry James
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 8:13 PM Jerry James wrote: > The various ANTLR packages will be impacted by > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs. The parser > generators, which are written in Java, will no longer be available on > i686. If absolutely necessary, we could continue to pac

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-19 Thread Jerry James
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 7:06 AM Jiri Vanek wrote: > How to find they are absolutely necessary? if-in them back if theirs > maintainers rise hand? > > Because that sounds like the way to go. Seeing the depndece chain, There > seems to be no pure show stopper. Yes, since none of the maintainers

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-19 Thread Jerry James
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 11:31 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > Not sure why your list does not include these, but the following > packages also build-require antlr-C++: > * gdl - already has java bcond; BR on antlr would need to be wrapped into > bcond > * nco - seems to have ability to be built with

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-14 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 7/11/22 07:31, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 4:15 AM Jerry James wrote: The various ANTLR packages will be impacted by https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs. The parser Thanx a lot for sharing the thoughts. generators, which are written in Java, will

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-10 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 4:15 AM Jerry James wrote: > > The various ANTLR packages will be impacted by > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs. The parser > generators, which are written in Java, will no longer be available on > i686. If absolutely necessary, we could continue to p