On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:07:46PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > don't get me wrong but i expect bugs viewable at every single boot
> > as fixed without a specific report a
>
> http://www.redhat.com/magazine/020jun06/features/bugzilla/
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 12:17:57AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 06.09.2013 20:26, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce:
> > Have your filed a BZ? What's the BZ#?
>
> don't get me wrong but i expect bugs viewable at every single boot
> as fixed without a specific report and to be honest not existing
> at a
Hi
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> don't get me wrong but i expect bugs viewable at every single boot
> as fixed without a specific report a
>
http://www.redhat.com/magazine/020jun06/features/bugzilla/
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
Am 06.09.2013 20:26, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 11:26:39PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 05.09.2013 23:11, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce:
>>> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
* there is *nothing* in this configuration referring to the rel
On Sex, 2013-09-06 at 10:18 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 06.09.2013 05:21, schrieb Matthew Garrett:
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:33:40AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >> whay is Fedora starting with this crap exatly with the
> >> release having a short-minded name with special chars
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 11:26:39PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 05.09.2013 23:11, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce:
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> * there is *nothing* in this configuration referring to the release name
> >
> > /boot/grub2/grub.cfg is generated
Am 06.09.2013 05:21, schrieb Matthew Garrett:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:33:40AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> whay is Fedora starting with this crap exatly with the
>> release having a short-minded name with special chars
>> not properly handeled by the whole OS?
>
> You're sending email
Maybe something like (the incredibly ugly)
http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/tmp/mapping.diff
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:33:40AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> whay is Fedora starting with this crap exatly with the
> release having a short-minded name with special chars
> not properly handeled by the whole OS?
You're sending email to the development mailing list, so you're
presumably a de
On Fri, 2013-09-06 at 00:33 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> whay is Fedora starting with this crap exatly with the
> release having a short-minded name with special chars
> not properly handeled by the whole OS?
I know you're upset Harald, but I would request you to please refrain
from terms such as
Am 05.09.2013 20:32, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> On Qui, 2013-09-05 at 16:35 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> do we get this annoying wrong display in GRUB fixed
>> inside the F19 lifetime or *at least* if i remove it
>> from /boot/grub2/grub.cfg and have only
>> "Fedora (3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64)" get
Am 06.09.2013 00:26, schrieb Chris Murphy:
>
> On Sep 5, 2013, at 11:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> i simply edited /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
>> and after that i expect *nothing* to add the release name
>> *but* a lter kernel updates is adding it again
>>
>> i am using Fedor since "Fedora Core 3"
On Sep 5, 2013, at 11:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> i simply edited /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
> and after that i expect *nothing* to add the release name
> *but* a lter kernel updates is adding it again
>
> i am using Fedor since "Fedora Core 3" and i am maintaining
> more than 20 fedora setups an
Am 05.09.2013 23:11, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> * there is *nothing* in this configuration referring to the release name
>
> /boot/grub2/grub.cfg is generated via the grub2-mkconfig script, which
> uses settings from /etc/default
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> * there is *nothing* in this configuration referring to the release name
/boot/grub2/grub.cfg is generated via the grub2-mkconfig script, which
uses settings from /etc/default/grub.
/etc/default/grub uses the content from /etc/syste
Am 05.09.2013 22:04, schrieb Przemek Klosowski:
> On 09/05/2013 02:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> so, no whatever macro is repsonsible for this exactly at the release with a
>> non well thought release name this
>> happens -why in the world does Fedora again and agin make decisions which
>> are
On 09/05/2013 02:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
so, no whatever macro is repsonsible for this exactly at the release
with a non well thought release name this happens -why in the world
does Fedora again and agin make decisions which are *not* tested and
months before release the impact is known ar
On Qui, 2013-09-05 at 16:35 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> do we get this annoying wrong display in GRUB fixed
> inside the F19 lifetime or *at least* if i remove it
> from /boot/grub2/grub.cfg and have only
> "Fedora (3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64)" get away insist at
> *every* kernel update add " 19 (S
On Qui, 2013-09-05 at 20:52 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 05.09.2013 20:32, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > On Qui, 2013-09-05 at 16:35 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> do we get this annoying wrong display in GRUB fixed
> >> inside the F19 lifetime or *at least* if i remove it
> >> from /boot/grub2
19 matches
Mail list logo
