Dne 18. 07. 24 v 10:06 odp. Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
In any case, please don't do any more changes and we should revisit
this
Standing by. :)
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
___
devel mailing list -
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 4:48 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 3:39 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 18. 07. 24 1:30, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > You are conflating license tag conversion with a license audit. Tag
> > > conversion is explicitly*not* an audit exercise.
> >
> > No, I s
On 18. 07. 24 22:46, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 3:39 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 18. 07. 24 1:30, Neal Gompa wrote:
You are conflating license tag conversion with a license audit. Tag
conversion is explicitly*not* an audit exercise.
No, I state the old GPL tags and the new GPL
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 3:39 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 18. 07. 24 1:30, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > You are conflating license tag conversion with a license audit. Tag
> > conversion is explicitly*not* an audit exercise.
>
> No, I state the old GPL tags and the new GPL identifiers have different
>
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 11:33:13AM GMT, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 9:40 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 18. 07. 24 1:30, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > You are conflating license tag conversion with a license audit. Tag
> > > conversion is explicitly*not* an audit exercise.
> >
>
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 9:40 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 18. 07. 24 1:30, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > You are conflating license tag conversion with a license audit. Tag
> > conversion is explicitly*not* an audit exercise.
>
> No, I state the old GPL tags and the new GPL identifiers have different
>
On 18. 07. 24 1:30, Neal Gompa wrote:
You are conflating license tag conversion with a license audit. Tag
conversion is explicitly*not* an audit exercise.
No, I state the old GPL tags and the new GPL identifiers have different
meanings.
This is not an audit, and we have never offered a guar
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 7:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 17. 07. 24 22:15, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 3:41 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 17. 07. 24 v 6:41 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> >>
> >>> Done.
> >>
> >> Hi Mirek,
> >> I am a bit confused.
> >>
> >> I thought
On 17. 07. 24 22:15, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 3:41 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 17. 07. 24 v 6:41 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
Done.
Hi Mirek,
I am a bit confused.
I thought there was a clear nonconsensus about the *GPL conversion [1] which resulted to
the FESCo ticket [
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 3:41 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 17. 07. 24 v 6:41 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
>
> > Done.
>
> Hi Mirek,
> I am a bit confused.
>
> I thought there was a clear nonconsensus about the *GPL conversion [1] which
> resulted to the FESCo ticket [2]. It is kinda surprising
Dne 17. 07. 24 v 6:41 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> Done.
Hi Mirek,
I am a bit confused.
I thought there was a clear nonconsensus about the *GPL conversion [1] which resulted to the FESCo ticket [2]. It is
kinda surprising to see the "Done." comment here and in the LGPL thread as well.
[1]
On 17. 07. 24 13:56, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 18. 06. 24 v 8:19 dop. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
I am going to do the mass change of the license from AGPLv3 to AGPL-3.0-only
Done.
Hi Mirek,
I am a bit confused.
I thought there was a clear nonconsensus about the *GPL conversion [1] which
res
Dne 18. 06. 24 v 8:19 dop. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
I am going to do the mass change of the license from AGPLv3 to AGPL-3.0-only
Done.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
___
devel mailing list -- de
13 matches
Mail list logo
