On Thu, 12.08.10 12:06, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
> > > Yes, that is correct. An already built version on f15 will always be
> > > "newer" than anything coming up from f14.
> >
> > Can I "undo" such a build? I did that mostl
On Thu, 12.08.10 22:10, Chen Lei (supercyp...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
Heya,
>
> I found that systemd-units depends on pkgconfig, is this dependency
> really needed for minimum systemd?
Yes, this is intended this way. udev does the same these days. We
consider .pc files simply a nice wa
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:10:25PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
> I found that systemd-units depends on pkgconfig, is this dependency
> really needed for minimum systemd?
Please file things like this in bugzilla so they don't get lost in the chaos
of this discussion list.
--
Matthew Miller
Senior Sy
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
> > Yes, that is correct. An already built version on f15 will always be
> > "newer" than anything coming up from f14.
>
> Can I "undo" such a build? I did that mostly because I forgot that the
> branching already happened when I built systemd the
Hi Lennart,
I found that systemd-units depends on pkgconfig, is this dependency
really needed for minimum systemd?
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Lennart Poettering wrote, at 08/12/2010 10:28 PM +9:00:
> On Thu, 12.08.10 00:52, Jesse Keating (jkeat...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes, that is correct. An already built version on f15 will always be
>> "newer" than anything coming up from f14.
>
> Can I "undo" such a build? I did that mostly be
On Thu, 12.08.10 00:52, Jesse Keating (jkeat...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> Yes, that is correct. An already built version on f15 will always be
> "newer" than anything coming up from f14.
Can I "undo" such a build? I did that mostly because I forgot that the
branching already happened when I built
Jesse Keating writes:
> Yes, that is correct. An already built version on f15 will always be
> "newer" than anything coming up from f14.
Which is exactly the situation with systemd.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/12/2010 12:42 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Jesse Keating writes:
>
>> When an F14 build goes stable through bodhi, it'll be inherited into
>> rawhide.
>
> Unless there is already a release of the package tagged dist-f15, IIUC.
>
> Andreas.
>
Jesse Keating writes:
> When an F14 build goes stable through bodhi, it'll be inherited into
> rawhide.
Unless there is already a release of the package tagged dist-f15, IIUC.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/11/2010 07:11 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 12.08.10 01:40, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote:
>
>>
>> Frank Murphy wrote:
>>> I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14
>>> systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 04:11 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 12.08.10 01:40, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote:
>
> >
> > Frank Murphy wrote:
> > > I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14
> > > systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push the same broken updates to
>
On Thu, 12.08.10 01:40, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote:
>
> Frank Murphy wrote:
> > I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14
> > systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push the same broken updates to
> > F15(Rawhide)
>
> Normally, development is supposed to happen in Rawhi
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 01:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Frank Murphy wrote:
> > I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14
> > systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push the same broken updates to
> > F15(Rawhide)
>
> Normally, development is supposed to happen in Rawhide FIRST.
Frank's
Frank Murphy wrote:
> I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14
> systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push the same broken updates to
> F15(Rawhide)
Normally, development is supposed to happen in Rawhide FIRST.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/08/10 11:32, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> wrong:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=10477
>
> the newer versions have only been built for f14 not rawhide.
I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14
systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push the same broken updat
2010/8/11 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 08/11/2010 10:32 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>> 2010/8/11 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
>>> On 08/11/2010 09:02 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>>>
>>> instead of trying to workaround the problem i actually tried to check
>>> if a clean install of latest package would work
On 08/11/2010 10:32 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> 2010/8/11 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
>> On 08/11/2010 09:02 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>>
>> instead of trying to workaround the problem i actually tried to check
>> if a clean install of latest package would work properly with this
>> result:
>>
>> Instal
2010/8/11 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 08/11/2010 09:02 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>
> instead of trying to workaround the problem i actually tried to check
> if a clean install of latest package would work properly with this
> result:
>
> Installing : systemd-units-5-2.fc15.x86_64
>
> This is f
On 08/11/2010 09:02 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
instead of trying to workaround the problem i actually tried to check
if a clean install of latest package would work properly with this
result:
Installing : systemd-units-5-2.fc15.x86_64
This is far from being the latest packages ( the latest b
instead of trying to workaround the problem i actually tried to check
if a clean install of latest package would work properly with this
result:
Installing : systemd-units-5-2.fc15.x86_64
1/4
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sqw1k7: line 25: 19348 Segmentati
On 08/04/2010 02:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 04.08.10 02:40, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, 04.08.10 00:10, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
>>
>> Small addition. When I was referring to rawhide I meant both F-14 and
>> the new rawhi
On 04/08/10 20:41, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Disable selinux in grub and boot with upstart
>
> Grap the latest systemd packages from koji ( systemd and systemd-units )
>
> Remove systemd and systemd-units ( rpm -e systemd systemd-units )
>
> Reinstall systemd and systemd unit.
>
> reboot and
On 08/04/2010 06:05 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> This from an F13.x86> F14-Rawhide> F14-Branched Guest
> (Host if F13.x86_64)
>
> Some still from the video:
>
> http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185144.php
>
> http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185343.php
>
> http://www.
This from an F13.x86 > F14-Rawhide > F14-Branched Guest
(Host if F13.x86_64)
Some still from the video:
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185144.php
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185343.php
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185650.php
http://www.zi
On 04/08/10 16:41, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> Well, can you be more precise? Can you try this bodhi build?
Just got my daughter to take a video of start up,
so will try grab snaps from it and or upload somewhere.
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.3.2-0.1.885483.fc14,systemd-5
On Wed, 04.08.10 16:27, Frank Murphy (frankl...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On 04/08/10 16:08, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >>># systemctl enable graphical.target
> >>>
> >>> This makes sure the default.target link is created properly
> >>
> >> I still believe that for this particular one (and a few
On 04/08/10 16:08, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>># systemctl enable graphical.target
>>>
>>> This makes sure the default.target link is created properly
>>
>> I still believe that for this particular one (and a few of the others) we
>> should make the trivial changes to the spec to have it done
On Wed, 04.08.10 10:51, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
> > And here's another addition: you might also want to run this command
> > when upgrading from older rwahide to current F-14/rawhide:
> >
> > # systemctl enable graphical.
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
> And here's another addition: you might also want to run this command
> when upgrading from older rwahide to current F-14/rawhide:
>
> # systemctl enable graphical.target
>
> This makes sure the default.target link is created properly
I still b
On Wed, 04.08.10 02:40, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
>
> On Wed, 04.08.10 00:10, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
>
> Small addition. When I was referring to rawhide I meant both F-14 and
> the new rawhide. i.e. both F-14 and F-15.
And here's another additio
On Wed, 04.08.10 00:10, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
Small addition. When I was referring to rawhide I meant both F-14 and
the new rawhide. i.e. both F-14 and F-15.
> Heya,
>
> just a little heads up for when you upgrade a rawhide system that is a
> few weeks old to current
32 matches
Mail list logo
