On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:41:25PM +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 05:43 AM, Jon wrote:
> Right, release cycle will definitely be a hot topic, and i'd like us to
Maybe too early, it's probably better to answer "what do you want to
release" before you choice the right release cycle :-)
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> And with that conflict - resources to backport stuff or do updates (that's
> the reason why we have so many updates - no resources to backport fixes,
> more hope that upstream fixed it and it's regression free :D).
Note that it's not strict
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/06/2013 12:31 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 11/06/2013 11:09 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
>>> On 11/06/2013 04:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP S
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/06/2013 11:09 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> > On 11/06/2013 04:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 11/06/2013 09:57 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >>> On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/06/2013 11:09 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 04:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 11/06/2013 09:57 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 15:38:10 +0100, Phil Knirs
On 11/06/2013 04:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/06/2013 09:57 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 15:38:10 +0100, Phil Knirsch
wrote:
But i do like the idea of well "Overlap" releases? Where most of
the release would stay st
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/06/2013 09:57 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 15:38:10 +0100, Phil Knirsch
> wrote:
>>
>> But i do like the idea of well "Overlap" releases? Where most of
>> the release would stay stable in a sense of API/ABI and we could
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 15:38:10 +0100,
Phil Knirsch wrote:
But i do like the idea of well "Overlap" releases? Where most of the
release would stay stable in a sense of API/ABI and we could still
bring out a newer release.
Since we have a system where multiple kernel types can be installe
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 02:46 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/06/2013 05:43 AM, Jon wrote:
Another item I'd like to consider for the initial discussion is the
release cycle for
On 11/06/2013 02:46 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
On 11/06/2013 05:43 AM, Jon wrote:
Another item I'd like to consider for the initial discussion is the
release cycle for the base design. My feeling is that base is small
enough and simple enough to a
- Original Message -
> > One request i also already got was if we in the Base WG could take a look
> > at
> > containers/sandboxes for applications as well. Basically so that the
> > technology could be used by any derived product built on top of Base. And
> > as
> > there are currently mul
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 05:43 AM, Jon wrote:
>> Another item I'd like to consider for the initial discussion is the
>> release cycle for the base design. My feeling is that base is small
>> enough and simple enough to allow a more frequent release, perha
On 11/06/2013 05:43 AM, Jon wrote:
On Nov 4, 2013 12:01 PM, "Stephen Gallagher" mailto:sgall...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/04/2013 11:07 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> > Hi everyone.
> >
> > A quick update from my side regarding the Base D
On 11/04/2013 07:01 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/04/2013 11:07 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Hi everyone.
A quick update from my side regarding the Base Design WG:
- My proposed committee was approved by FESCO last Wednesday. One
negative vote cam
- Original Message -
> Howdy folks.
>
> Looking forward to getting to work on base design. Regarding the voting
> members I feel we have a great group. Everyone intersted (voting or not)
> should participate in our discussions. My vote will certainly be influenced
> by anyone in the commun
On Nov 4, 2013 12:01 PM, "Stephen Gallagher" wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/04/2013 11:07 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> > Hi everyone.
> >
> > A quick update from my side regarding the Base Design WG:
> >
> > - My proposed committee was approved by FESCO last Wedn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/04/2013 11:07 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> A quick update from my side regarding the Base Design WG:
>
> - My proposed committee was approved by FESCO last Wednesday. One
> negative vote came from Stephen Gallagher that he would
17 matches
Mail list logo
