Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-11 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/11/2013 10:31 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: > On 11/10/2013 01:39 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> A few other things, I would like to see broken out would be sort of a >> lower level definition for containers, based on the docker model. IE Can >> we remo

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-11 Thread Phil Knirsch
On 11/09/2013 08:26 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 03:21:04PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: Hey, I read your minutes, and discussed some of my thoughts on this with my workstation wg peers. Basically, I think that defining a 'base' as a particular set of packages (minimal inst

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-11 Thread Harald Hoyer
On 11/10/2013 01:39 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > A few other things, I would like to see broken out would be sort of a lower > level definition for containers, based on the docker model. IE Can we remove > the need for systemd/kernel from the new container group? > > Base > Minimal Install > Conta

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-11 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - > On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:51 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > * LINK: http://fpaste.org/52688/38392758/ (pknirsch, 16:19:54) > > * Base definition: installer, compose tools, minimal install (for some > > definition there), and functionality the majority pr

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-10 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/08/2013 11:51 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > == > #fedora-meeting: Fedora Base Design Working Group (2013-11-08) > =

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-09 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 03:21:04PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Hey, I read your minutes, and discussed some of my thoughts on this with > my workstation wg peers. Basically, I think that defining a 'base' as a > particular set of packages (minimal install, or some variant thereof) > does not re

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-08 Thread Matthias Clasen
Forgot one thing - the installer question. I think it already came up tangentially in some of the workstation prd discussions, but I think we should at least be open to the idea that the different products need to be able to define their own install experience. That would imply that the 'installe

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-08 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:51 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > * LINK: http://fpaste.org/52688/38392758/ (pknirsch, 16:19:54) > * Base definition: installer, compose tools, minimal install (for some > definition there), and functionality the majority products want to > use (pknirsch, 16

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-08 Thread Bill Nottingham
Dennis Gilmore (den...@ausil.us) said: > Meeting started by pknirsch at 15:00:59 UTC. The full logs are available > at > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-11-08/fedora_base_design_working_group.2013-11-08-15.00.log.html Apologies for not making the meeting. Some comments > *