Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-23 Thread Patrick MONNERAT
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 15:59 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orphaned a

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:21:24 + Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Bill Nottingham > wrote: > > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for > > orphaned packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages > > where necessary. It's that time again f

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-13 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orphaned and e

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-11 Thread Jon Ciesla
Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said: > >> I took Io-language. I'll take odfpy and taglib if the comaintainers >> don't want them. >> > > Rex has said he'd prefer if someone else takes taglib, so go ahead. > > Bill > If he wants to orphan it, I will. -J -- i

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-11 Thread Bill Nottingham
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said: > I took Io-language. I'll take odfpy and taglib if the comaintainers > don't want them. Rex has said he'd prefer if someone else takes taglib, so go ahead. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-10 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Hi, i took ice since it is business critical, co-maintainers are *very* welcome. best regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-10 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:42PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan TeXmacs Grabbed. Jindrich -- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá, kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není člověk, to je vůl.

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-09 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
07.02.2011 23:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orphaned and exist in F-15. A

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-09 Thread Mat Booth
On 9 February 2011 10:42, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > On 02/08/2011 12:58 PM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote: >> Orphan maven-doxia-tools >> Orphan maven-javadoc-plugin >> Orphan plexus-cli > > Added myself as co-maintainer/watcher > Excellent, thanks :-) >> Orphan geronimo-jms >> Orphan geronimo-j

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-09 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
On 02/08/2011 12:58 PM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote: > Orphan maven-doxia-tools > Orphan maven-javadoc-plugin > Orphan plexus-cli Added myself as co-maintainer/watcher > Orphan geronimo-jms > Orphan geronimo-jta > Orphan geronimo-parent-poms > Orphan apache-resource-bundles Took these -- Stanisla

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread John Reiser
On 02/08/2011 09:21 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: >> On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: >>> Orphan smolt >> >> Don't we still use this by default on all spins? > If no one seems eager to take over maintainership should we replace >

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:21:00AM -0600, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> Orphan smolt > > > > Don't we still use this by default on all spins? > > Did Mike McGrath drop maintainership of smolt

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Jon Ciesla
Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 02/07/2011 02:30 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > <38K snipped> > > >> I took Io-language. I'll take odfpy and taglib if the comaintainers >> don't want them. >> >> -J >> >> > > Please trim the quoted messages in your replies. > > Noted, sorry. I noticed right afte

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 02/07/2011 02:30 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: <38K snipped> > I took Io-language. I'll take odfpy and taglib if the comaintainers > don't want them. > > -J > Please trim the quoted messages in your replies. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Divis

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Mohammed Morsi
On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan rubygem-ParseTree > Orphan rubygem-RubyInline > Orphan rubygem-ZenTest > Orphan rubygem-abstract > Orphan rubygem-archive-tar-minitar > Orphan rubygem-mime-types > Orphan rubygem-rcov > Orphan rubygem-ruby2ruby > Orphan rubygem-ruby_parse

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Orphan smolt > > Don't we still use this by default on all spins? Did Mike McGrath drop maintainership of smolt when he stepped out of the Fedora Infrastructure Lead role? I used to maint

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 11:31:36 -0500 "Paul W. Frields" wrote: > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:42PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Orphan odfpy > > comaintained by: pfrields > > Orphan python-mwlib > > comaintained by: pfrields > > I don't foresee a problem maintaining the first, and I'll

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:42PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan odfpy > comaintained by: pfrields > Orphan python-mwlib > comaintained by: pfrields I don't foresee a problem maintaining the first, and I'll take that over for now. The calibre package depends on it, and I want

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Adam Jackson
Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan libgle Taken. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Peter Robinson
> Orphan libfakekey I grabbed this one. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:24:46 +, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Orphan smolt > > Don't we still use this by default on all spins? I am pretty sure we want to keep this one. The source is on Fedora Hosted. It would be nice of one of the upst

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I took matchpbox-window-manager needed for sandbox. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1RUQUACgkQrlYvE4MpobPj8QCgy0OGT3Ukex0bspNQTbIZhGPr Ql0AnA

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Mat Booth
On 8 February 2011 12:00, Alexander Kurtakov wrote: > On 01:59:44 pm Tuesday, February 08, 2011 Mat Booth wrote: >> On 8 February 2011 11:47, Mat Booth wrote: >> > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> >> Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned >> >> p

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Alexander Kurtakov
On 01:59:44 pm Tuesday, February 08, 2011 Mat Booth wrote: > On 8 February 2011 11:47, Mat Booth wrote: > > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > >> packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages w

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Alexander Kurtakov
On 01:56:00 pm Tuesday, February 08, 2011 Mat Booth wrote: > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > > necessary. It's that time again for Fedor

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
On 02/08/2011 12:47 PM, Mat Booth wrote: > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned >> packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where >> necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. >> >> The follo

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Mat Booth
On 8 February 2011 11:47, Mat Booth wrote: > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned >> packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where >> necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. >> >> The fo

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Mat Booth
On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orphaned and exist i

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Richard Hughes
On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan smolt Don't we still use this by default on all spins? Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan k3b > comaintained by: jreznik rdieter rnovacek This one is well-maintained, but there was some misunderstanding over who's supposed to be the primary maintainer. This should get cleared up today. > Orphan kcm_touchpad I've taken this one. It is shipped on the KD

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 02/07/2011 09:59 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orphaned and exist

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Jerry James
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan bigloo >comaintained by: salimma > > Orphan ffcall >comaintained by: salimma > I need these two to work, so I can either maintain or comaintain if the existing comaintainer would like me to. -- Jerry James http://

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:42PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan ocaml-lablgl > comaintained by: rjones > Orphan: gtkglarea2 I took these two. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. C

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Dominic Hopf
Am Montag, den 07.02.2011, 15:59 -0500 schrieb Bill Nottingham: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orpha

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Jon Ciesla
Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orphaned and exist in F-15. As > you can see, t

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Mohamed El Morabity
Le lundi 07 février 2011 à 15:59 -0500, Bill Nottingham a écrit : > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orp