Re: [389-devel] Re-engaging the Samba4 LDAP backend

2010-04-01 Thread Michael Ströder
Endi Sukma Dewata wrote: > We're considering this proposal for FDS: > http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/RDN_Value > At this point it's still being designed, so I can't say yet when this > would become available. I wonder how that's supposed to work for multi-valued RDNs (which are not needed

Re: [389-devel] Re-engaging the Samba4 LDAP backend

2010-03-30 Thread masarati
> I'm trying to pick up the ball again on the OpenLDAP and Fedora DS > backends, and hopefully to bring them back up to speed as a working and > respectable solution. > > LDB will always be the Samba Team's primary backend for Samba4. This is > particularly the case as there seems no reasonable pr