Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
> We're considering this proposal for FDS:
> http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/RDN_Value
> At this point it's still being designed, so I can't say yet when this
> would become available.
I wonder how that's supposed to work for multi-valued RDNs (which are not
needed
> I'm trying to pick up the ball again on the OpenLDAP and Fedora DS
> backends, and hopefully to bring them back up to speed as a working and
> respectable solution.
>
> LDB will always be the Samba Team's primary backend for Samba4. This is
> particularly the case as there seems no reasonable pr