Re: [389-devel] 1.2.6-1 crash

2010-09-29 Thread Noriko Hosoi
Could you do "thread apply all bt", once you see this Segmentation fault message? Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fe4a23e9710 (LWP 9557)] 0x7fe4d1fc601c in attrlist_find_or_create_locking_optional () from /usr/lib64/dirsrv/libslapd.so.0 (gdb) t

Re: [389-devel] 1.2.6-1 crash

2010-09-29 Thread Gary Morris
sure.. i'll do that and rerun them.. On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: > On 09/29/2010 12:49 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> Gary Morris wrote: >> >>> ah.. sorry.. ok.. just retried with 1.2.6.1-1.. / >>> >>> [r...@dalp-ct02 logs]# rpm -qa | grep 389 >>> 389-dsgw-1.1.5-1.fc13.

Re: [389-devel] 1.2.6-1 crash

2010-09-29 Thread Noriko Hosoi
On 09/29/2010 12:49 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: Gary Morris wrote: ah.. sorry.. ok.. just retried with 1.2.6.1-1.. / [r...@dalp-ct02 logs]# rpm -qa | grep 389 389-dsgw-1.1.5-1.fc13.x86_64 389-admin-console-1.1.5-1.fc13.noarch 389-admin-1.1.11-1.fc13.x86_64 389-ds-base-1.2.6.1-1.fc13.x86_64 389-d

Re: [389-devel] 1.2.6-1 crash

2010-09-29 Thread Rich Megginson
Gary Morris wrote: > > ok.. it pulled 389-ds-base-1.2.6-2.fc13.x86_64.. is that ok or do i > need to be on 1.2.6-1? On 1.2.6-2 I'm having the same problem. As > soon as I start an application that is ldap intensive, the directory > server crashes real quick. No errors of any sort reported. No