Re: /usr/share vs /usr/libexec

2015-04-25 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, On Qua, 2015-04-22 at 08:17 -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > Hello, > >> I confess I've only seen /usr/libexec used for add-on utilities, but > >> now I'm curious. > >> > >> Does it make more sense for these sort of scripts to live in > >>

Re: /usr/share vs /usr/libexec

2015-04-22 Thread Paul Wouters
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Miloslav Trmač wrote: now I'm curious. Does it make more sense for these sort of scripts to live in /usr/libexec, or in /usr/share? /usr/libexec. From (info standards): `libexecdir' The directory for installing executable programs to be run by other programs ra

Re: /usr/share vs /usr/libexec

2015-04-22 Thread Miloslav Trmač
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > Hello, > >> I confess I've only seen /usr/libexec used for add-on utilities, but > >> now I'm curious. > >> > >> Does it make more sense for these sort of scripts to live in > >> /usr/libexec, or in /usr/share? > > > > /usr/libexec. Fro

Re: /usr/share vs /usr/libexec

2015-04-22 Thread Ken Dreyer
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > Hello, >> I confess I've only seen /usr/libexec used for add-on utilities, but >> now I'm curious. >> >> Does it make more sense for these sort of scripts to live in >> /usr/libexec, or in /usr/share? > > /usr/libexec. From (info standards)

Re: /usr/share vs /usr/libexec

2015-04-22 Thread Miloslav Trmač
Hello, > I confess I've only seen /usr/libexec used for add-on utilities, but > now I'm curious. > > Does it make more sense for these sort of scripts to live in > /usr/libexec, or in /usr/share? /usr/libexec. From (info standards): > `libexecdir' > The directory for installing executable p