On 2011-12-19 10:32, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> I can tell you right now that cornercases will never be caught with
> tools like this. Licensecheck only looks at headers/comments, whereas
> licensing depends on many things and can be quite confusing. I am sure
> that rpmdevtools maintainers wou
Excerpts from Brendan Jones's message of Fri Dec 16 00:32:24 +0100 2011:
> On 12/15/2011 09:57 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
> > On 11/21/2011 02:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >> Hello fellow devs,
> >>
> >> I am sure quite a few of you have done some reviews and thought "Hey,
> >> a,b,c and d co
On 16.12.2011 00:32, Brendan Jones wrote:
Not sure if this is something which should be part of this package or
another entirely?
Sure, we will reinvent the wheel yet again (see
http://www.fossology.org/ ... yes it would probably require some
fedora-wide server, or maybe not, I don't know eno
On 12/15/2011 09:57 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 11/21/2011 02:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Hello fellow devs,
I am sure quite a few of you have done some reviews and thought "Hey,
a,b,c and d could be automated. For E I could use some more
information that can be automatically gathered".
On 11/21/2011 02:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Hello fellow devs,
I am sure quite a few of you have done some reviews and thought "Hey,
a,b,c and d could be automated. For E I could use some more
information that can be automatically gathered". Some of you even
wrote your own tools to do so
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 17:06 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 02:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >- Any ideas, bugreports etc will be much appreciated
>
> I would be very interested in feature, which instead of mock, will run
> Koji scratch build and then will download resulti
On 11/21/2011 02:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>- Any ideas, bugreports etc will be much appreciated
I would be very interested in feature, which instead of mock, will run
Koji scratch build and then will download resulting packages from Koji.
--
Miroslav Suchy
Red Hat Satellite Engine
Well there may be a chance this tool may eventually become officially
adopted by QA after it gets tested and used long enough to consider it
safe/stable.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky <
sochotni...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"'s message of Mon
Excerpts from "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"'s message of Mon Nov 21 14:25:22 +0100
2011:
> > [1] https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview
> > [2] https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/browser/api/README
>
> Is this not something that releng/autoqa could use as well as in run
> against all already existing
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 13:25 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 01:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> > Hello fellow devs,
> >
> > I am sure quite a few of you have done some reviews and thought "Hey,
> > a,b,c and d could be automated. For E I could use some more
> > informatio
On 11/21/2011 01:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Hello fellow devs,
>
> I am sure quite a few of you have done some reviews and thought "Hey,
> a,b,c and d could be automated. For E I could use some more
> information that can be automatically gathered". Some of you even
> wrote your own tools
11 matches
Mail list logo
