Re: RPM artifacts related to ghost files

2013-06-05 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 06/05/2013 09:59 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 06/05/2013 05:30 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: Thanks for noticing and reporting! Thanks for caring. I've got another one: In abrt-2.1.4-1.fc17.i686, the ghost files /var/run/abrt/abrt.socket and /var/run/abrt/abrtd.pid both have inode 0 and link

Re: RPM artifacts related to ghost files

2013-06-05 Thread Florian Weimer
On 06/05/2013 05:30 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: Thanks for noticing and reporting! Thanks for caring. I've got another one: In abrt-2.1.4-1.fc17.i686, the ghost files /var/run/abrt/abrt.socket and /var/run/abrt/abrtd.pid both have inode 0 and link count 2. But they can't be hard-linked beca

Re: RPM artifacts related to ghost files

2013-06-05 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 06/05/2013 04:41 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: I looked at some file list inconsistencies in a custom tool and discovered several odd things related to ghost files. A few packages contain hard-linked files where some of the names have the ghost flag set, but others haven't. Probably the most pro