Re: RISC-V ABI issue with ULEB128

On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:07 PM Nick Clifton wrote: > > Hi David, > > > binutils-2.31-18.fc40 didn't land in f40 as Bodhi CI gating marked it > > as failed. The failures don't seem to be related to binutils package > > itself. Seems like CI test is/was broken, or maybe a temporary network > > issue

Re: RISC-V ABI issue with ULEB128

Hi David, binutils-2.31-18.fc40 didn't land in f40 as Bodhi CI gating marked it as failed. The failures don't seem to be related to binutils package itself. Seems like CI test is/was broken, or maybe a temporary network issue, or something else. It looks like rpminspect does not like two of th

Re: RISC-V ABI issue with ULEB128

On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 11:20 AM Nick Clifton wrote: > > Hi David, Hi Florian, > > Here's the bug: > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31179 > RISC-V: The SET/ADD/SUB fix breaks ABI compatibility with 2.41 objects > > It refers to this change in binutil

Re: RISC-V ABI issue with ULEB128

Hi David, Hi Florian, Here's the bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31179 RISC-V: The SET/ADD/SUB fix breaks ABI compatibility with 2.41 objects It refers to this change in binutils 2.41: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=73d931e560059a87d76f528fafbb4

Re: RISC-V ABI issue with ULEB128

On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 7:20 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:15 PM David Abdurachmanov > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 6:26 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:05 PM David Abdurachmanov > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:

Re: RISC-V ABI issue with ULEB128

On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:15 PM David Abdurachmanov wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 6:26 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:05 PM David Abdurachmanov > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:54 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > > > > > * David Abdurachmanov: > > >

Re: RISC-V ABI issue with ULEB128

On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 6:26 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:05 PM David Abdurachmanov > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:54 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > > > * David Abdurachmanov: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 1:09 PM Richard W.M. Jones > > > > wrote: >

Re: RISC-V ABI issue with ULEB128

On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:05 PM David Abdurachmanov wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:54 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > * David Abdurachmanov: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 1:09 PM Richard W.M. Jones > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> I'm not sure exactly the effect on RISC-V binaries, but

Re: RISC-V ABI issue with ULEB128

On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:54 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * David Abdurachmanov: > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 1:09 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> > >> > >> I'm not sure exactly the effect on RISC-V binaries, but I wanted to > >> raise it here to get the attention of the Fedora toolchain team ..

Re: RISC-V ABI issue with ULEB128

* David Abdurachmanov: > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 1:09 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> >> I'm not sure exactly the effect on RISC-V binaries, but I wanted to >> raise it here to get the attention of the Fedora toolchain team ... >> >> Here's the bug: >> >> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: RISC-V ABI issue with ULEB128

On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 1:09 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > I'm not sure exactly the effect on RISC-V binaries, but I wanted to > raise it here to get the attention of the Fedora toolchain team ... > > Here's the bug: > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31179 > RISC-V: The SET/A

RISC-V ABI issue with ULEB128

I'm not sure exactly the effect on RISC-V binaries, but I wanted to raise it here to get the attention of the Fedora toolchain team ... Here's the bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31179 RISC-V: The SET/ADD/SUB fix breaks ABI compatibility with 2.41 objects It refers to this