On 22.09.20 10:21, Andrea Perotti wrote:
> That has changed in the last hour, after the bugzilla has been opened [0].
> Glad to see the status in our systems now match the (sad) reality:
> at least if there are ppl interested in it, they could step up.
I took it, I'll work on getting it updated to
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 09:42, Matthias Runge
wrote:
> if you take a look at [3], you see the package is orphaned, and I would
> assume, (a) it is free to take and (b) the former maintainer has either
> no time or no interest anymore.
>
That has changed in the last hour, after the bugzilla has be
On 22/09/2020 09:21, Andrea Perotti wrote:
> Hi,
> is anyone in contact with Gratien D'Haese?
>
> I'm opening this thread and this bugzilla[0] as per policy [1].
>
> I've noticed that on Fedora `rear` package is stuck at 2.4, while
> upstream released rear 2.6 [2].
>
> Also you can see there
Hi,
is anyone in contact with Gratien D'Haese?
I'm opening this thread and this bugzilla[0] as per policy [1].
I've noticed that on Fedora `rear` package is stuck at 2.4, while upstream
released rear 2.6 [2].
Also you can see there's no interaction since 24 months at least from the
official
