Re: Questions about font packaging, hinting and non-responsive maintainer process

2015-03-06 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I think we are much better off shipping the unhinted version then, letting the > Freetype autohinter do its job. Agreed. So that takes care of the question of including the HTML file with the comparison of the two. As far as the doc package i

Re: Questions about font packaging, hinting and non-responsive maintainer process

2015-03-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > 1. He uses a program called Fontographer by Fontlab [1] which > apparently includes a couple of algorithms for autohinting. He said > that it would be a huge task to do the hinting manually for such a > large number of glyphs, so it's all done by the software. Ewww, a

Re: Questions about font packaging, hinting and non-responsive maintainer process

2015-03-05 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
He wrote back, here's what I've learned: 1. He uses a program called Fontographer by Fontlab [1] which apparently includes a couple of algorithms for autohinting. He said that it would be a huge task to do the hinting manually for such a large number of glyphs, so it's all done by the software. 2.

Re: Questions about font packaging, hinting and non-responsive maintainer process

2015-03-05 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
I've contacted upstream about the hinting, I'll report when I hear back. In the mean time, can anyone offer any advice on the other points besides hinting? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fed

Re: Questions about font packaging, hinting and non-responsive maintainer process

2015-03-05 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 03/05/2015 09:02 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: (Unless they are bad hints. Slightly ironic that Cantarell looks better with the autohinter.) Cantarell has been broken for a while, but nothing has been done to fix it. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647003 https://bugzilla.gnome.or

Re: Questions about font packaging, hinting and non-responsive maintainer process

2015-03-05 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 02:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Are those hinting instructions manually tuned or autogenerated with > ttfautohint? If it's the latter, there's no value in them because Freetype > already uses essentially the same autohinting algorithms ttfautohint uses, > ttfautohint was

Re: Questions about font packaging, hinting and non-responsive maintainer process

2015-03-04 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Are those hinting instructions manually tuned or autogenerated with > ttfautohint? I haven't the faintest idea. Should I contact upstream, or is there a way to extract that information from the font tables? The creator specifically mentions wi

Re: Questions about font packaging, hinting and non-responsive maintainer process

2015-03-04 Thread Kevin Kofler
Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > 1. There are now 2 fonts, the usual Symbola.ttf plus another one, > Symbola_hint.ttf, which includes hinting instructions. I had a really > hard time trying to find differences between the two, Are those hinting instructions manually tuned or autogenerated with ttfau

Questions about font packaging, hinting and non-responsive maintainer process

2015-03-04 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hello, A few days ago I was fooling around with Unicode stuff and I noticed that the Symbola font had been updated upstream, but not in Fedora, so I decided to have a go at repackaging it and submitting the spec file to the maintainer. Turns out it was more "fun" than I thought it would be. 1. Th