On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 03:54:34PM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 11:17 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > The correct way is to patch the Makefiles so they can build shared
> > libraries, to send those patches upstream, and to unbundle any bundled
> > libraries. It's quite a
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 11:17 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> The correct way is to patch the Makefiles so they can build shared
> libraries, to send those patches upstream, and to unbundle any bundled
> libraries. It's quite a bit of work, but if upstream accept your
> patches then hopefully it'
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 03:28:01PM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working on packaging required software to add to the fedora medical
> initiative.
>
> Of late, I've come across quite a few *tiny* libraries which are build
> deps for the software. The issue with most of these are tha
Hello,
I'm working on packaging required software to add to the fedora medical
initiative.
Of late, I've come across quite a few *tiny* libraries which are build
deps for the software. The issue with most of these are that they only
provide static libraries. These are generally libraries used by
