On 1 April 2015 at 11:50, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Is it alright to just commit it as an extra package source existing within
> the package script sources repo (like how we handle patches) until we can
> get it upstreamed?
Sure, that's fine as well, thanks.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:34 AM, David Timms wrote:
> On 01/04/15 12:54, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > David Timms (dti...@iinet.net.au) said:
> ...
> > I thought about trying to reliably parse major/minor/subminor versions in
> > bash, and track it against where things were implemented. But then jus
On 01/04/15 12:54, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> David Timms (dti...@iinet.net.au) said:
...
> I thought about trying to reliably parse major/minor/subminor versions in
> bash, and track it against where things were implemented. But then just went
> the lazy route:
>
> if appstream-util --help | grep
David Timms (dti...@iinet.net.au) said:
> On 01/04/15 00:34, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On 31 March 2015 at 14:07, David Timms wrote:
> >> I see my package was adjusted, but I can't get it to build:
> >
> > I only build the new-enough libappstream-glib into rawhide -- seeing
> > as most of the f2
On 01/04/15 00:34, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 31 March 2015 at 14:07, David Timms wrote:
>> I see my package was adjusted, but I can't get it to build:
>
> I only build the new-enough libappstream-glib into rawhide -- seeing
> as most of the f23 builds have succeeded I'll do the same for F22 and
On 31 March 2015 at 14:07, David Timms wrote:
> I see my package was adjusted, but I can't get it to build:
I only build the new-enough libappstream-glib into rawhide -- seeing
as most of the f23 builds have succeeded I'll do the same for F22 and
submit an update. F20 is much too old for that ver
On 27/03/15 04:48, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 05:40:29PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> So, the overwhelming amount of help I received (one person) meant I
>> spent the whole of today fixing up 230 packages. Most of the packages
>
> Looks like about 22 hours since you asked f
Thank you, I've received the notifications.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 05:40:29PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> So, the overwhelming amount of help I received (one person) meant I
> spent the whole of today fixing up 230 packages. Most of the packages
Looks like about 22 hours since you asked for help, so... I dunno, one
person seems pretty g
On 25 March 2015 at 19:40, Richard Hughes wrote:
> -- I can't promise cookies, but I'll really appreciate it and it means
> the applications won't disappear from Fedora 23. Yell if you have any
> questions.
So, the overwhelming amount of help I received (one person) meant I
spent the whole of tod
In the effort to make the AppStream generation simpler I'm going to
deprecate the fedora-appstream repo[1]. This was always designed to be
a stop-gap until upstreams had done new tarball releases and to
"rescue" applications that we care a lot about, and we're now at a
point where over 50% of upstr
11 matches
Mail list logo
