On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> There are still about half a dozen packages left that failed the recent
> mass rebuild because they contain source-code dependencies on obsolete
> versions of libpng and/or libtiff. I've filed patches to fix them,
> but don't have permissions to
Adam Williamson writes:
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 01:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There are still about half a dozen packages left that failed the recent
>> mass rebuild because they contain source-code dependencies on obsolete
>> versions of libpng and/or libtiff. I've filed patches to fix them,
>
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 01:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> There are still about half a dozen packages left that failed the recent
> mass rebuild because they contain source-code dependencies on obsolete
> versions of libpng and/or libtiff. I've filed patches to fix them,
> but don't have permissions to
There are still about half a dozen packages left that failed the recent
mass rebuild because they contain source-code dependencies on obsolete
versions of libpng and/or libtiff. I've filed patches to fix them,
but don't have permissions to do it myself. If any provenpackagers
have a bit of time t
