Re: Proposed mass bug filing for webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package removal

2016-09-14 Thread Scott Talbert
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 23:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: I've started filing bugs and will continue throughout the week. Michael Well nevermind that, I'm (mostly) finished: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375784 The one thing I

Re: Proposed mass bug filing for webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package removal

2016-09-14 Thread jens
Am 14.09.2016 05:26, schrieb Michael Catanzaro: On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 23:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: I've started filing bugs and will continue throughout the week. Michael Well nevermind that, I'm (mostly) finished: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375784 The one thing I

Re: Proposed mass bug filing for webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package removal

2016-09-13 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 23:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > I've started filing bugs and will continue throughout the week. > > Michael Well nevermind that, I'm (mostly) finished: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375784 The one thing I did not do was file individual bugs for all o

Re: Proposed mass bug filing for webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package removal

2016-09-13 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 08:36 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > I propose to carry out a mass bug filing with the bug title: > "Remove > > webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 dependency" (depending on which package is > > dependend on) and following text: I've started filing bugs and will continue throughout the

Re: Proposed mass bug filing for webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package removal

2016-09-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:01:27AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 07:34:04AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I propose to carry out a mass bug filing with the bug title: "Remove > > webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 dependency" (depending on which package is > > depe

Re: Proposed mass bug filing for webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package removal

2016-09-06 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 07:34:04AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, > > I propose to carry out a mass bug filing with the bug title: "Remove > webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 dependency" (depending on which package is > dependend on) and following text: > > """ > The webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package will b

Re: Proposed mass bug filing for webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package removal

2016-09-05 Thread Michael Catanzaro
Thanks for the feedback! I think the link is actually fine in the devel-announce version of the mail that you didn't get to see. It's indeed broken by my reply quotes. On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 16:27 +, Christian Stadelmann wrote: > 4. Btw: In the mail referenced above you've written about an upd

Re: Proposed mass bug filing for webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package removal

2016-09-05 Thread Christian Stadelmann
1. your link is broken. This should work: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel%40lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/AKVB363GFCHHJ5MTHGVYHYT6NLLTF5VM/ 2. I like the idea! 3. about the FESCO exceptions: > Question: What if my application doesn't process untrusted input? > > Answer: I

Proposed mass bug filing for webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package removal

2016-09-05 Thread Michael Catanzaro
Hi, I propose to carry out a mass bug filing with the bug title: "Remove webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 dependency" (depending on which package is dependend on) and following text: """ The webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package will be removed from rawhide after Fedora 26 is branched due to the high number of unfixe

Re: Proposed mass bug filing for webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package removal

2016-09-05 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 07:34 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, > > I propose to carry out a mass bug filing with the bug title: "Remove > webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 dependency" (depending on which package is > dependend on) and following text: > > """ > The webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 package will be remov