- Original Message -
> Hello,
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda
> wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> What problem are the _mri_/_jruby_ parameters solving?
> >> a) If a script or command-line user requires a specific
> >> interpreter,
> >> it can just refer to a
On 01/24/2013 11:07 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bohuslav Kabrda (bkab...@redhat.com) said:
>> JRuby and Ruby won't share extensions. Extensions for Ruby will live in
>> %{_libdir}/gems/ruby, while extensions for JRuby will in
>> %{_datadir}/gems/jruby (although we decided not to actually ship a
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> What problem are the _mri_/_jruby_ parameters solving?
>
> Generally, we are trying to get into Fedora more Ruby interpreters, we are
> currently speaking about Ruby MRI, JRuby and Rubinius in near future.
> Therefore, we would like to allow
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> What problem are the _mri_/_jruby_ parameters solving?
>> a) If a script or command-line user requires a specific interpreter,
>> it can just refer to a path of the specific interpreter directly;
>> us
Bohuslav Kabrda (bkab...@redhat.com) said:
> JRuby and Ruby won't share extensions. Extensions for Ruby will live in
> %{_libdir}/gems/ruby, while extensions for JRuby will in
> %{_datadir}/gems/jruby (although we decided not to actually ship any JRuby
> extension Gems for F19 as we want to tak
Dne 23.1.2013 18:59, Miloslav Trmač napsal(a):
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Features/JRuby 1.7 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/JRuby_1.7
What should "/usr/bin/ruby" point to? During standard Gem packaging process,
the executable files in Gems get sheba
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
> wrote:
> > As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features
> > are required
> > to pass through the community review by announcing them on
> > devel-announce list.
> > FESCo votes on new features no
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
> wrote:
> > = Features/JRuby 1.7 =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/JRuby_1.7
>
> > What should "/usr/bin/ruby" point to? During standard Gem
> > packaging process,
> > the executable files in Gems get
- Original Message -
> I think the more interesting question is what to do about extensions
> (ie. not pure Ruby gems that contain C code). Last time I looked
> JRuby was pretty incompatible; in fact for libguestfs we recommend
> that people use the *Java* bindings with JRuby ...
>
> Rich
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
> to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
> list.
> FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Features/JRuby 1.7 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/JRuby_1.7
> What should "/usr/bin/ruby" point to? During standard Gem packaging process,
> the executable files in Gems get shebangs according to the binary that they
> ar
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:44:16PM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> On 01/23/2013 07:28 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >As JRuby is setup to share pure ruby gems with ruby, I don't think this can
> >be approved (inlcuding the update to the jruby package to do this) until FPC
> >rules on whether it's
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:05:23AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> What should "/usr/bin/ruby" point to?
>
Took a look just to make sure -- this portion needs to get into the new
packaging guidelines. Maybe in the Applicatoins section?
-Toshio
pgpFRnqNwXwpf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
d
I think the more interesting question is what to do about extensions
(ie. not pure Ruby gems that contain C code). Last time I looked
JRuby was pretty incompatible; in fact for libguestfs we recommend
that people use the *Java* bindings with JRuby ...
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Grou
On 01/23/2013 07:28 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:05:23AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new feature
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:05:23AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >
> > - Changes in packaging
> > None yet. JRuby will be able to use pure Ruby Gems packaged into
> > RPM out of
> > the box, but packaging of Gems with JRuby extensions is turning
> > out to be
>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:05:23AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
> to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
> list.
> FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announce
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:05:23AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
> to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
> list.
> FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announce
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/JRuby 1.7 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/JRub
19 matches
Mail list logo
