Re: Practical use of fedabipkgdiff

2018-04-04 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 07:47 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Sinny Kumari > wrote: > > As far as I am aware, right now fedabipkgdiff tool doesn't support > > ABI > > comparison against scratch build. I see this feature as a nice > > addition. > > > > One option is to d

Re: Practical use of fedabipkgdiff

2018-04-04 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Sinny Kumari wrote: > As far as I am aware, right now fedabipkgdiff tool doesn't support ABI > comparison against scratch build. I see this feature as a nice addition. > > One option is to download scratch build rpms locally and use "fedabipkgdiff > --from fc29 pat

Re: Practical use of fedabipkgdiff

2018-04-03 Thread Sinny Kumari
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm working on a new version of hamlib (3.1 -> 3.2) and instead of > building manually or downloading packages and using abi-compliance-checker, > I was going to try and use fedabipkgdiff from the libabigail package. > > How do I go about doin

Practical use of fedabipkgdiff

2018-04-03 Thread Richard Shaw
I'm working on a new version of hamlib (3.1 -> 3.2) and instead of building manually or downloading packages and using abi-compliance-checker, I was going to try and use fedabipkgdiff from the libabigail package. How do I go about doing that (best practice) that should be less work than doing ever