Re: Postgresql namespace

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22J=F3hann_B=2E_Gu=F0mundsson=22?= writes: > BTW What's the difference between upstream packages and the packages we > build as in why does upstream feel compelled to provide it's own > packages and repo? Upstream, or more accurately Devrim, provides prebuilt packages for a rang

Re: Postgresql namespace

Is there any reason why we aren't naming this as closed to upstream as possible? http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/8.4/fedora/fedora-12-x86_64/ BTW What's the difference between upstream packages and the

Re: Postgresql namespace

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 02:17:57PM +0300, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: > FWIW, since Fedora/RHEL (up to 5.5) does support only 1 PostgreSQL > version w/ RPMs, this 3rd party repository helps people to use recent > PG versions with their distros. (Majority of our users are RHEL 5 users, > who use PostgreSQ

Re: Postgresql namespace

On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 16:58 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Perhaps I was not clear but my question was if multiple of Postgres is > a useful to thing to have, why don't we do it in the Fedora repo > instead of having users seek out and use a third party repo? As I wrote: I'm *not* maintaining Pos

Re: Postgresql namespace

On 04/26/2010 04:47 PM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote > FWIW, since Fedora/RHEL (up to 5.5) does support only 1 PostgreSQL > version w/ RPMs, this 3rd party repository helps people to use recent > PG versions with their distros. (Majority of our users are RHEL 5 users, > who use PostgreSQL 8.3 and 8.4 on RH

Re: Postgresql namespace

On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 12:22 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Any reason not to have it in the Fedora repo instead of your own? I'm not the maintainer of PostgreSQL package in Fedora/RHEL. Tom (Lane) has been already maintaining it and doing very good job over there at Red Hat. He will *probably* do

Re: Postgresql namespace

On 04/26/2010 12:19 PM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 14:47 -0400, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote: > >> If I check in the Ubuntu Lucid repository, orafce is packaged as >> postgresql-8.3-orafce, same for Debian. >> > It is probably because they ship different PostgreSQL versio

Re: Postgresql namespace

On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 14:47 -0400, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote: > If I check in the Ubuntu Lucid repository, orafce is packaged as > postgresql-8.3-orafce, same for Debian. It is probably because they ship different PostgreSQL versions in each distro. Fedora does not have this yet (FWIW, I'm wor

Re: Postgresql namespace

Matthias Runge writes: > Thinking of more general packages, e.g a java binding for postgresql, I > would prefer names like postgresql-java (or similar) to be able to > differentiate from mysql-java, ingres-java (given, those packages do > exist). To be conformant to this naming scheme, other pa

Re: Postgresql namespace

On 04/23/2010 08:47 PM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= writes: >>> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28 Should we have

Re: Postgresql namespace

> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= writes: > > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28 > >> > >> Should we have: > >> postgresql-pgpool-II > >> postgresql-orafce > >

Re: Postgresql namespace

On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= writes: > > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28 > >> > >> Should we have: > >> postgresql-pgpool-II > >> postgresql-orafce > >>

Re: Postgresql namespace

Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= writes: > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28 >> >> Should we have: >> postgresql-pgpool-II >> postgresql-orafce >> >> or just: >> pgpool-II >> orafce >> >> Let start discussing. M

Re: Postgresql namespace

On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28 > > Should we have: > postgresql-pgpool-II > postgresql-orafce > > or just: > pgpool-II > orafce > > Let start discussing. My opinion is postgresql-* because it has kind > of same na

Postgresql namespace

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28 Should we have: postgresql-pgpool-II postgresql-orafce or just: pgpool-II orafce Let start discussing. My opinion is postgresql-* because it has kind of same namespace. -- Miroslav Suchy Red Hat Satellite Engineering -- devel mailing list