Re: PostgreSQL 9.6.0 rebase

2016-10-10 Thread Pavel Raiskup
Hi William, On Monday, October 10, 2016 8:19:44 AM CEST William Moreno wrote: > El 10/10/2016 3:12 a. m., "Pavel Raiskup" escribió: > > > > Hi all, > > > > there's new PostgreSQL version 9.6.0 out and we plan to build this into > > Fedora Rawhide within few moments (a bit of testing remains now).

Re: PostgreSQL 9.6.0 rebase

2016-10-10 Thread William Moreno
El 10/10/2016 3:12 a. m., "Pavel Raiskup" escribió: > > Hi all, > > there's new PostgreSQL version 9.6.0 out and we plan to build this into > Fedora Rawhide within few moments (a bit of testing remains now). > > This action requires re-buliding of packages that provide binary > PostgreSQL modules,

Re: PostgreSQL 9.6.0 rebase

2016-10-10 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Monday, October 10, 2016 11:07:55 AM CEST Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > there's new PostgreSQL version 9.6.0 out and we plan to build this into > > Fedora Rawhide within few moments (a bit of testing remains now). > > Is ther

Re: PostgreSQL 9.6.0 rebase

2016-10-10 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Hi all, > > there's new PostgreSQL version 9.6.0 out and we plan to build this into > Fedora Rawhide within few moments (a bit of testing remains now). Is there a FESCo approved change? > This action requires re-buliding of packages that p

PostgreSQL 9.6.0 rebase

2016-10-10 Thread Pavel Raiskup
Hi all, there's new PostgreSQL version 9.6.0 out and we plan to build this into Fedora Rawhide within few moments (a bit of testing remains now). This action requires re-buliding of packages that provide binary PostgreSQL modules, basically this is about: $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo='*' --e