Re: PolicyKit authentication agent changes

2011-02-28 Thread Bill Nottingham
Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@googlemail.com) said: > > anything at all. > > Please try to look beyond the rim of your KDE teacup for a moment. What > about the DEs / WMs that do not provide a polkit agent? Shouldn't we > make things like virt-manager just work in *every* environment? >

Re: PolicyKit authentication agent changes

2011-02-28 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Saturday, February 26, 2011 04:15:38 pm Kevin Kofler wrote: > Christoph Wickert wrote: > > Please try to look beyond the rim of your KDE teacup for a moment. What > > about the DEs / WMs that do not provide a polkit agent? Shouldn't we > > make things like virt-manager just work in *every* envir

Re: PolicyKit authentication agent changes

2011-02-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Christoph Wickert wrote: > Please try to look beyond the rim of your KDE teacup for a moment. What > about the DEs / WMs that do not provide a polkit agent? Shouldn't we > make things like virt-manager just work in *every* environment? Well, the DEs which don't provide their own agent should pick

Re: PolicyKit authentication agent changes

2011-02-26 Thread Christoph Wickert
Am Samstag, den 26.02.2011, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Kevin Kofler: > Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2011, 20:08 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen: > >> Thats between you and the window managers... but > >> as far as gnome is concerned, we don't want to depend on anything > >> virtual

Re: PolicyKit authentication agent changes

2011-02-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2011, 20:08 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen: >> Thats between you and the window managers... but >> as far as gnome is concerned, we don't want to depend on anything >> virtual, but control which agent is running. > > I can understand this very well

Re: PolicyKit authentication agent changes

2011-02-26 Thread Christoph Wickert
Hi Matthias, thanks for your quick response. I was busy, that's why I'm not so quick. Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2011, 20:08 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen: > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 00:14 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > Can you explain what the advantage of your approach is? From a packaging >

Re: PolicyKit authentication agent changes

2011-02-23 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 00:14 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Can you explain what the advantage of your approach is? From a packaging > point it looks broken: One the one hand we package a authentication > agent that cannot run by itself, on the other we package an autostart > file for something

Re: PolicyKit authentication agent changes

2011-02-23 Thread Christoph Wickert
Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2011, 15:55 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen: > As of version 0.100 (which will land in F15 as a post-alpha update), the > polkit-gnome package will no longer install an autostart file for > polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1. Instead, each desktop environment > is reponsible f

PolicyKit authentication agent changes

2011-02-23 Thread Matthias Clasen
As of version 0.100 (which will land in F15 as a post-alpha update), the polkit-gnome package will no longer install an autostart file for polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1. Instead, each desktop environment is reponsible for making sure that an authentication agent is running. For GNOME, this i