Re: Plans for anaconda LVM/RAID support

2012-10-26 Thread Vratislav Podzimek
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 12:04 -0700, John Reiser wrote: > On 10/25/2012 09:55 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Matthew Miller >[snip] > >> It is often useful in enterprise settings to do non-kickstart installs > >> while > >> prototyping. *And*, people running Fedora i

Re: Plans for anaconda LVM/RAID support

2012-10-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 12:04 -0700, John Reiser wrote: > Then anaconda balks at taking over a disk configuration that I create > using other tools. Namely, anaconda won't format an unformatted > existing partition, So, I must use another pass to discover Fedora's > "default" arguments to mkfs bef

Re: Plans for anaconda LVM/RAID support

2012-10-25 Thread Gerry Reno
On 10/25/2012 03:04 PM, John Reiser wrote: > On 10/25/2012 09:55 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Matthew Miller >[snip] >>> It is often useful in enterprise settings to do non-kickstart installs while >>> prototyping. *And*, people running Fedora in those settings pro

Re: Plans for anaconda LVM/RAID support

2012-10-25 Thread John Reiser
On 10/25/2012 09:55 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Matthew Miller [snip] >> It is often useful in enterprise settings to do non-kickstart installs while >> prototyping. *And*, people running Fedora in those settings probably *are* >> prototyping. So, this seems like an

Re: Plans for anaconda LVM/RAID support

2012-10-25 Thread Ken Dreyer
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:47:21AM -0500, David Lehman wrote: >> > It means F18 GUI installation will be completely unusable for people >> > requiring enterprise features but unable to write own kickstart >> > themselves. >> Such people nee

Re: Plans for anaconda LVM/RAID support

2012-10-25 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:47:21AM -0500, David Lehman wrote: > > It means F18 GUI installation will be completely unusable for people > > requiring enterprise features but unable to write own kickstart > > themselves. > Such people need to either hire a sysadmin or fire their current one. If > you

Re: Plans for anaconda LVM/RAID support

2012-10-25 Thread David Lehman
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 12:10 +0200, Milan Broz wrote: > On 10/07/2012 02:36 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > I'm sure that this information is somewhere on the Fedora Wiki, but my > > search-fu apparently isn't up to the task of finding it. > > > > What are the plans for LVM and/or software RAID support?

Re: Plans for anaconda LVM/RAID support

2012-10-07 Thread Milan Broz
On 10/07/2012 02:36 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > I'm sure that this information is somewhere on the Fedora Wiki, but my > search-fu apparently isn't up to the task of finding it. > > What are the plans for LVM and/or software RAID support? > > Currently (F18 Beta TC2), it seems to be impossible for t

Re: Plans for anaconda LVM/RAID support

2012-10-07 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 07:57:24AM +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote: > The only workaround nowaday is to install Fedora without > installing the bottloader. After the installation you have > to boot from a rescue media and install the bootmanager > after chroot to the root partitition in the LVM. You'

Re: Plans for anaconda LVM/RAID support

2012-10-06 Thread Jochen Schmitt
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 07:36:13PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > Currently (F18 Beta TC2), it seems to be impossible for those of us who > have fully allocated our storage to either (or both) of these > technologies to install Fedora 18 at all. I have compain a simular issue a few months ago on th

Plans for anaconda LVM/RAID support

2012-10-06 Thread Ian Pilcher
I'm sure that this information is somewhere on the Fedora Wiki, but my search-fu apparently isn't up to the task of finding it. What are the plans for LVM and/or software RAID support? Currently (F18 Beta TC2), it seems to be impossible for those of us who have fully allocated our storage to eith