Mail original -
> De: "Vascom"
> À: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Envoyé: Dimanche 31 Mai 2020 12:13:58
> Objet: Re: Packaging problem
>
>
>
> I think Qt will not be upgraded in F31.
>
>
&g
And is applying the workaround just for Fedora 31 tolerated ?
- Mail original -
De: "Vascom"
À: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Envoyé: Dimanche 31 Mai 2020 12:13:58
Objet: Re: Packaging problem
I think Qt will not be upgraded in F31.
You can jus
s problem is
> already fixed on Fedora 32.
>
> Does a Qt5 update is programmed for Fedora 31 ?
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Vascom"
> À: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Envoyé: Dimanche 31 Mai 2020
ions related to Fedora"
Envoyé: Dimanche 31 Mai 2020 11:50:49
Objet: Re: Packaging problem
You should report upstream about the problem and fix code.
вс, 31 мая 2020 г., 12:49 < ycollette.nos...@free.fr >:
Hello again !
I've got a new problem: a gcc flags trigger a problem
il original -
> De: "ycollette nospam"
> À: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Envoyé: Samedi 30 Mai 2020 21:58:55
> Objet: Re: Packaging problem
>
> OK, thanks, it works with %{qmake_qt5} but
CONFIG+=opus_shared_lib
%make_build VERBOSE=1
- Mail original -
De: "ycollette nospam"
À: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Envoyé: Samedi 30 Mai 2020 21:58:55
Objet: Re: Packaging problem
OK, thanks, it works with %{qmake_qt5} but not with
ent discussions related to Fedora"
Envoyé: Samedi 30 Mai 2020 21:49:46
Objet: Re: Packaging problem
First you should use this macro %{qmake_qt5} and remove %{set_build_flags}.
And show your spec or give srpm.
сб, 30 мая 2020 г. в 22:21, :
>
> Hello,
>
> I've got a problem w
: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> Envoyé: Samedi 30 Mai 2020 21:44:08
> Objet: Re: Packaging problem
>
> Am Samstag, den 30.05.2020, 21:20 +0200 schrieb
> ycollette.nos...@free.fr:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've got a problem with a package.
> &
discussions related to Fedora"
Envoyé: Samedi 30 Mai 2020 21:44:08
Objet: Re: Packaging problem
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2020, 21:20 +0200 schrieb
ycollette.nos...@free.fr:
> Hello,
>
> I've got a problem with a package.
> I am trying to clean up a spec file before sending it to
First you should use this macro %{qmake_qt5} and remove %{set_build_flags}.
And show your spec or give srpm.
сб, 30 мая 2020 г. в 22:21, :
>
> Hello,
>
> I've got a problem with a package.
> I am trying to clean up a spec file before sending it to review and I've got
> an error:
>
> erreur : Emp
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2020, 21:20 +0200 schrieb
ycollette.nos...@free.fr:
> Hello,
>
> I've got a problem with a package.
> I am trying to clean up a spec file before sending it to review and
> I've got an error:
>
> erreur : Empty %files file /home/artelys/rpmbuild/BUILD/jamulus-
> c6b6e3ab02d7e
Hello,
I've got a problem with a package.
I am trying to clean up a spec file before sending it to review and I've got an
error:
erreur : Empty %files file
/home/artelys/rpmbuild/BUILD/jamulus-c6b6e3ab02d7ec1e93edeeb8042a89a561924826/debugsourcefiles.list
The code is Qt-5 / c++. It's an applic
Before submitting a bugzilla, I wonder whether this is a choice made on
purpose or not.
The pybind11-devel package defines a set of CMake Module files. But (at
least for fedora 29) these files do not end up in
/usr/share/cmake/Modules as usually but in /usr/share/cmake/pybind11
where cmake does no
> Il 22/01/2017 12:38, Martin Gansser ha scritto:
> This one works
> for me:
> https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/nuvola-app-spotify.spec
>
> There was nothing really wrong in your .spec, but for some reason the
> 'make install' script tried to run also 'make uninstall' (and thus all
> the errors a
> On 01/22/2017 01:03 PM, Martin Gansser wrote:
> IMHO, you have an install tree leftover by a previous run with incorrect
> user/permissions. You should remove it manually with the appropriate
> privileges before retrying.
yes you are right, that was the reason.
Many Thanks
_
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/22/2017 01:47 PM, Till Maas wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 12:47:15PM +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
>>>
>>> At a glance: the usual convention is 'make DESTDIR=... install', not
>>> 'make
>>> install DEST=---'
>>
>>
>> Actually there
On 01/22/2017 01:47 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 12:47:15PM +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
At a glance: the usual convention is 'make DESTDIR=... install', not 'make
install DEST=---'
Actually there is %make_install which is recommended by the Packaging
Guidelines IIRC.
%make_inst
Il 22/01/2017 12:38, Martin Gansser ha scritto:
This is the rpm spec file I use:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/nuvolaplayer/nuvola-app-spotify.spec
have somebody a idea how can this be fixed ?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 12:47:15PM +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
> At a glance: the usual convention is 'make DESTDIR=... install', not 'make
> install DEST=---'
Actually there is %make_install which is recommended by the Packaging
Guidelines IIRC.
Kind regards
Till
__
On 01/22/2017 01:03 PM, Martin Gansser wrote:
I tried several combinations, but always the same behaviour.
#%make_install DEST=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/nuvolaplayer3/web_apps/
#make DESTDIR=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/nuvolaplayer3/web_apps/ install
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="inst
I tried several combinations, but always the same behaviour.
#%make_install DEST=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/nuvolaplayer3/web_apps/
#make DESTDIR=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/nuvolaplayer3/web_apps/ install
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"
_
On 22/01/17 12:38, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi,
i want o create a rpm package of a small plugin for nuvolaplayer, but this
fails with this error:
+ cd /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ '['
/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/nuvola-app-spotify-2.2-0.1git1828d92.fc25.x86_64
'!=' / ']'
+ rm -rf
/hom
Hi,
i want o create a rpm package of a small plugin for nuvolaplayer, but this
fails with this error:
+ cd nuvola-app-spotify-1828d92b7e9412fba629b95b33ed63e819203dd3
+ /usr/bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .
+ exit 0
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dldLHl
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/mar
Hello everyone,
I hope this is the correct list. OpenERP 6 and 7 are in Fedora. I am
working on making some open source modules for OpenERP/Odoo and for a
long time I have put off installing Odoo, in part because it isn't
packaged for Fedora. I am currently working on fixing this, at least so
that
24 matches
Mail list logo
