On 12/9/21 10:12 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 09/12/2021 14:17, Sandro Mani wrote:
>> Is this in any way acceptable?
>
> All packages must be built completely from sources.
>
>> Is this compatible with
>
> You must remove all pre-built artifacts and minified sources before
> creatin
On 12/18/21 3:04 AM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 December 2021 23:59:23 CET Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> On 12/10/21 6:56 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>> On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via de
On Thursday, 16 December 2021 23:59:23 CET Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 12/10/21 6:56 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >> On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >>> On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Man
On 12/10/21 6:56 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>> On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
> This does not appear to be accurate for nodejs packages - take i
Hi,
if the packages is using yarn, you can simply use its caching mechanism for
bundling the needed node modules. You will have an offline cache where you can
install the modules from!
Example: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-bash-language-server
Take a look at prepare_vendor.sh whi
On Thursday, December 9, 2021 6:59:17 PM CET Ben Beasley wrote:
> I haven’t looked at pgAdmin4, but I’m the current maintainer of
> nodejs-svgo and several other Fedora packages that use the new NodeJS
> packaging guidelines. I’m not the original packager for nodejs-svgo, and
> I wasn’t the firs
On 10.12.21 22:05, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:57 PM Sandro Mani wrote:
On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
This does not appear
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:57 PM Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>
> On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >> On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> >>> On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
> This does not appear to be accurate for nod
On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
This does not appear to be accurate for nodejs packages - take i.e.
node-svgo, which compliant with the guidelines bun
On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
>> On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>> This does not appear to be accurate for nodejs packages - take i.e.
>>> node-svgo, which compliant with the guidelines bundles node_modules
>>> dir in svgo
On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
This does not appear to be accurate for nodejs packages - take i.e.
node-svgo, which compliant with the guidelines bundles node_modules
dir in svgo-2.8.0-nm-dev.tgz resp svgo-2.8.0-nm-prod.tgz.
You can
I haven’t looked at pgAdmin4, but I’m the current maintainer of
nodejs-svgo and several other Fedora packages that use the new NodeJS
packaging guidelines. I’m not the original packager for nodejs-svgo, and
I wasn’t the first to convert it to the new NodeJS guidelines. I welcome
further communi
On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
This does not appear to be accurate for nodejs packages - take i.e. node-svgo,
which compliant with the guidelines bundles node_modules dir in
svgo-2.8.0-nm-dev.tgz resp svgo-2.8.0-nm-prod.tgz.
You can vendor only sources. No prebuilt assets are allowed
On 09.12.21 16:12, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 09/12/2021 14:17, Sandro Mani wrote:
Is this in any way acceptable?
All packages must be built completely from sources.
This does not appear to be accurate for nodejs packages - take i.e.
node-svgo, which compliant with the guidelines bun
fedoraproject.org%3e>>
*Subject*: Packaging pgAdmin4
*Date*: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 14:17:41 +0100
Hi
I gave it a go at packaging pgadmin4 [1], to replace the current
obsolete and abandoned (and crashy) pgadmin3.
pgadmin4 is a mix of Python/Flask for serverside and HTML/JS for
client side, for w
On 09/12/2021 14:17, Sandro Mani wrote:
Is this in any way acceptable?
All packages must be built completely from sources.
Is this compatible with
You must remove all pre-built artifacts and minified sources before
creating a vendored tarball.
NW.js must be built from sources.
--
Sincer
: Sandro Mani
Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Packaging pgAdmin4
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 14:17:41 +0100
Hi
I gave it a go at packaging pgadmin4 [1], to replace the current
obsolete and abandoned (and crashy) pgadmin3.
pgadmin4 i
Hi
I gave it a go at packaging pgadmin4 [1], to replace the current
obsolete and abandoned (and crashy) pgadmin3.
pgadmin4 is a mix of Python/Flask for serverside and HTML/JS for client
side, for which I wrote a minimal Qt5WebEngineView wrapper to make it
appear like a desktop application
18 matches
Mail list logo
