On Friday 14 June 2013 17:45:51 Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Dom, 2013-06-09 at 13:02 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> > As soon as dpkg-1.16.x hits f18.
>
> dpkg-1.16.10-4.fc18 hits f18 (status stable)
> Now alien is waiting for debhelper
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/debhelper-9.20120909-1.fc18
On Dom, 2013-06-09 at 13:02 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> > > debconf
>
>
>
> Went to give it some karma, found an irritating bug.
>
> Now it is fixed and pushed to rawhide, f19, f18 (waiting for karma
>
> on the last two)
>
debconf-1.5.49-3.fc18, status stable
>
> > > po-debconf
>
>
>
> N
On Dom, 2013-06-09 at 13:02 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> Some progress...
>
>
>
> On Saturday 08 June 2013 10:47:21 Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > > I'm going , if no problem, begin F18 cycle
>
> > > build this 7 packages:
>
> > > dpkg
>
>
>
> This is what debhelper is waiting for
>
>
>
> >
On Dom, 2013-06-02 at 20:56 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2013-05-07 at 14:07 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 May 2013 22:21:20 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 03:00:34AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591
On 06/02/2013 03:56 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> it is possible use Chained_builds ?
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_the_Koji_build_system#Chained_builds
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bodhi/BuildRootOverrides
Chained builds only work in rawhide, but you can manually do the
override tags for
On Ter, 2013-05-07 at 14:07 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 May 2013 22:21:20 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 03:00:34AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591190
> > I'm prepared to take debhelper. But:
> > (1) It looks l
On Ter, 2013-05-14 at 18:24 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> For BZ#695233,
> I make a better one, see comment 18 at:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695233
> Please point out any errors, thanks!
I my plan is commit BZ#648384 dpkg 1.6 which blocks BZ#961141
debhelper , after sub
For BZ#695233,
I make a better one, see comment 18 at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695233
Please point out any errors, thanks!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tuesday 07 May 2013 17:29:09 Sérgio Basto wrote:
> OK so lets cleanup all this reviews, do you finish the reviews
> requests ? I can only do it on week ends.
I intend to do my best . But other people (the reviewers) are also involved.
> we have Richard W.M. Jones and Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich also
On Ter, 2013-05-07 at 14:07 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 May 2013 22:21:20 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 03:00:34AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591190
> > I'm prepared to take debhelper. But:
> > (1) It looks l
On Wednesday 01 May 2013 22:21:20 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 03:00:34AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591190
> I'm prepared to take debhelper. But:
> (1) It looks like the latest package is over 1 year old. I think a
> new
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 03:00:34AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591190
I'm prepared to take debhelper. But:
(1) It looks like the latest package is over 1 year old. I think a
newer package should be presented (in this bug or in a newly opened
one).
(
Hi,
we have 3 Review Request stalled ,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695233
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591190
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591389
alien is ready , but depends on po-debconf and debhelper.
Anyone interested in review and packaging debh
13 matches
Mail list logo
