Re: Packaging Graylog2/unpackaged jar dependencies

2015-08-24 Thread gil
Il 25/08/2015 00:40, Kevin Kofler ha scritto: Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: Currently all dependencies must be packaged as RPMs and available in Fedora. some deps are still unavailable https://gil.fedorapeople.org/swagger-core-1.5.2-0.1.M1.fc20.src.rpm https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/ (work in

Re: Packaging Graylog2/unpackaged jar dependencies

2015-08-24 Thread Kevin Kofler
Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > Currently all dependencies must be packaged as RPMs and available in > Fedora. And yes, this means EVERY SINGLE jar MUST be built from source separately. Yes, we know this is not how Java developers work. But it is how Free Software works. Binary blobs are not acceptabl

Re: Packaging Graylog2/unpackaged jar dependencies

2015-08-23 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On 08/24/2015 05:38 AM, W. Michael Petullo wrote: > I am interested in packaging the Graylog2 log analysis platform for > Fedora. I have created a number of Fedora packages in the past, but I > am a novice when it comes to packaging Java. Java packaging HOWTO [1] may be useful. For specific questi

Packaging Graylog2/unpackaged jar dependencies

2015-08-23 Thread W. Michael Petullo
I am interested in packaging the Graylog2 log analysis platform for Fedora. I have created a number of Fedora packages in the past, but I am a novice when it comes to packaging Java. When I try to build my Graylog2 package, rpmbuild warns me that a number of dependencies are missing from the packa