On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:09:14PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> I have always filed a BZ against the 'setup' RPM asking for a
> static uid/gid pair to be allocated, and the changelogs support
> this approach:
Great, thanks!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715266
-jf
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:09:14 +0100, DPB (Daniel) wrote:
> > > You are misreading the PackageUserRegistry page. Or more likely, you
> > > haven't
> > > read it carefully enough to follow the link in the first sentence. RHEL
> > > doesn't use the
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:53:23PM +0200, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:55:33AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> > You are misreading the PackageUserRegistry page. Or more likely, you haven't
> > read it carefully enough to follow the link i
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:55:33AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> You are misreading the PackageUserRegistry page. Or more likely, you haven't
> read it carefully enough to follow the link in the first sentence. RHEL
> doesn't use the 'fedora-usermgmt'
than one node.
>
> I've found the PackageUserRegistry wiki page at:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry
>
> but it doesn't seem quite right, as there are many users there
> conflicting with the RHEL standard users:
>
>
> http://d
We're trying to package "Apache Traffic Server" for fedora, and need a
dedicated uid/gid for user/group "ats" running this services since it
includes clustering and config management over more than one node.
I've found the PackageUserRegistry wiki page at:
