Sounds good! Thank you!
Kenjiro
dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com writes:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Henrik Hodne wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> On 01/07/2014 08:22 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
>>> I have other pending open bugs, like one review for
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Henrik Hodne wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hey,
>
> On 01/07/2014 08:22 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
>> I have other pending open bugs, like one review for Christopher
>> Meng taking time because I'm not familiar with perl packaging. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2014 06:39 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Can upstream come up with a better name? ;)
>
> It has a long name and contains a binary with naming collisions.
>
> IMO someone should advise upstream to change name like
> "silversearcher" or "tss"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey,
On 01/07/2014 08:22 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> I have other pending open bugs, like one review for Christopher
> Meng taking time because I'm not familiar with perl packaging. I'm
> waiting for a sign from Henrik to resume the review, and I h
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Kenjiro NAKAYAMA
wrote:
> Hi, all
> (Sorry, Henrik and Dridi, I added you two in cc.)
Hi,
It's okay, probably the best way to make sure I notice it quickly.
> Package review of the_silver_searcher is stopped, and Fedora-review flags is
> sti
Can upstream come up with a better name? ;)
It has a long name and contains a binary with naming collisions.
IMO someone should advise upstream to change name like
"silversearcher" or "tss".
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/deve
Hi, all
(Sorry, Henrik and Dridi, I added you two in cc.)
Package review of the_silver_searcher is stopped, and Fedora-review flags is
still "?".
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008063
Altough It is late for FC 20, it should target to FC 21.
Can you please coninue the
