On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Mattias Ellert
wrote:
> mån 2011-10-31 klockan 19:02 +0100 skrev Till Maas:
>> I guess the directory /usr/share/icons/hicolor and the usual
>> subdirectories should be owned by the filesystem package.
>>
>> Regards
>> Till
>
> hicolor-icon-theme is a filesystem pac
mån 2011-10-31 klockan 19:02 +0100 skrev Till Maas:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:42:59AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
>
> > Are the fedora-logos and setroubleshoot packages doing it the right
> > way, and other icon-installing packages need to be fixed? Are they
> > doing it the wrong way, and shoul
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:42:59AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> Are the fedora-logos and setroubleshoot packages doing it the right
> way, and other icon-installing packages need to be fixed? Are they
> doing it the wrong way, and should be fixed themselves? Does
> ownership of that directory dep
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> I need some advice for a package review I'm doing. The package owns
> all the directories from /usr/share/icons/hicolor down to
> /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps, where it stores its icons. When
> I objected that these directories were a
I need some advice for a package review I'm doing. The package owns
all the directories from /usr/share/icons/hicolor down to
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps, where it stores its icons. When
I objected that these directories were already owned by
hicolor-icon-theme, the packager said:
"This
