Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-08-01 Thread Mat Booth
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 18:28, Christopher wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:10 PM Alexander Scheel wrote: > [snip] > > The Java SIG is here: > > > > - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Java > > Is there anything special one must do to "Join" the Java SIG? I would > like to join. No, it wa

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-31 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Christopher [30/07/2019 13:20] : > > Is there anything special one must do to "Join" the Java SIG? I would > like to join. SIGs are rather informal and none of them have a joining procedure that I know of. You should subscribe to the mailing list, introduce yourself and request any commit right

Re: "javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers)

2019-07-30 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 30. 07. 19 21:53, Dave Dykstra wrote: I don't see an answer to Jan's question about "javaewah" and think it might have gotten buried in the thread, so I'd like to say -- I have this question too. It seems something went wrong with the script that generated the list. Sorry, I've accidentally

Re: "javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers)

2019-07-30 Thread Alexander Scheel
- Original Message - > From: "Dave Dykstra" > To: "Alexander Scheel" > Cc: "Jan Pazdziora" , "Development discussions related > to Fedora" > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 4:45:06 PM > Subject: Re: "javaewah" (w

Re: "javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers)

2019-07-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
ander Scheel wrote: > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Dave Dykstra" > > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > > > > > Cc: "Jan Pazdziora" > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019

Re: "javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers)

2019-07-30 Thread Dave Dykstra
t; > > > > Cc: "Jan Pazdziora" > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 3:53:37 PM > > Subject: "javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new > > maintainers) > > > > I don't see an answer to Jan's question about "

Re: "javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers)

2019-07-30 Thread Alexander Scheel
- Original Message - > From: "Dave Dykstra" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Jan Pazdziora" > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 3:53:37 PM > Subject: "javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeki

"javaewah" (was Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers)

2019-07-30 Thread Dave Dykstra
I don't see an answer to Jan's question about "javaewah" and think it might have gotten buried in the thread, so I'd like to say -- I have this question too. It seems something went wrong with the script that generated the list. Dave On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 01:02:28PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-30 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:10 PM Alexander Scheel wrote: [snip] > The Java SIG is here: > > - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Java Is there anything special one must do to "Join" the Java SIG? I would like to join. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@li

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-30 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:07 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: [SNIP] > The issue is that no one has time to take ownership of these packages. The > whole premise around Fedora's package model for the last 15 years is that the > number of packagers and the number of packages linearly grew. You mig

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-30 Thread Alexander Scheel
> Where this fails is where there's duplication of efforts. Take slf4j as an > example. mizdebsk maintains it in one of his various modules (it looks like > the javapackages module). We maintain it in the SIG as an ursine package so > things like Dogtag and a lot of other things don't break. When y

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-30 Thread Alexander Scheel
- Original Message - > From: "Stephen John Smoogen" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Dinesh Prasanth Moluguwan Krishnamoorthy" > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 12:05:59 PM > Subject: Re: Over 500 orphaned pack

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-30 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
ted to Fedora" < >> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> >> > Cc: "Fabio Valentini" >> > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 6:14:57 PM >> > Subject: Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 5:36

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-30 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
> > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 6:14:57 PM > > Subject: Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers > > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 5:36 PM Alexander Scheel > wrote: > > > > > > > Question (not for Fabio specifically, but for the list) mo

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-30 Thread Alexander Scheel
- Original Message - > From: "Christopher" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Fabio Valentini" > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 6:14:57 PM > Subject: Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers >

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-30 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 30. 07. 19 12:41, Hans de Goede wrote: Hmm: [hans@shalem master]$ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires javapackages-filesystem | wc -l 3514 There are some doubles in here, due to multi-arch and updates, this includes things like: java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless Ouch, I do not see these miss

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-30 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 30-07-19 12:29, Hans de Goede wrote: 2) Remove the obsolete jpackage-utils stuff, which no longer is part of: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java From: cortado sdljava vecmath1.2 freecol bolzplatz2006 And keep them in the main Fedora repos Except that the guidelines say th

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-30 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 29-07-19 23:35, Alexander Scheel wrote: The reason I'm confused is because AFAIK last time jpackage-utils / javapackages-tools also was part of the set of packages causingproblems and javapackages-tools was picked up by the Stewardship SIG (or so I believe) so I'm surprised to see it go a

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-29 Thread Christopher
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 5:36 PM Alexander Scheel wrote: > > > Question (not for Fabio specifically, but for the list) modules can have > > (Build)Requires on other modules > > right? > > Yes, if the module maintainer is willing to expose their module in the > BUILDROOT. That was PKI's problem: miz

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-29 Thread Alexander Scheel
> The reason I'm confused is because AFAIK last time jpackage-utils / > javapackages-tools also was part of the set of > packages causingproblems and javapackages-tools was picked up by the > Stewardship SIG (or so I believe) so I'm > surprised to see it go away again now. One of the SIG's 3 revie

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-29 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 29-07-19 16:59, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Mon, Jul 29, 2019, 16:40 Miro Hrončok mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 29. 07. 19 16:35, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 29-07-19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> The following packages are orphaned and will be retire

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-29 Thread Todd Zullinger
Miro Hrončok wrote: > Note that jgit is not (yet) orphaned nor retired, and its dependencies might > be picked up by somebody. I suggest to remove the dep in rawhide temporarily > (to make the next weeks reports more readable and shorter to calculate (the > present one took 2 days)). Once the dust

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-29 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019, 16:40 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 29. 07. 19 16:35, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 29-07-19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > >> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for >

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-29 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 29. 07. 19 16:44, Todd Zullinger wrote: Hi, Pavel Cahyna wrote: On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 29. 07. 19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. I

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-29 Thread Todd Zullinger
Hi, Pavel Cahyna wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> On 29. 07. 19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they >>> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure >>> that the pa

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-29 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 29. 07. 19 16:35, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 29-07-19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-29 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 29-07-19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-29 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:37:33PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fed

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-29 Thread Pavel Cahyna
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 29. 07. 19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > > that the package should be retired, ple

Re: Over 500 orphaned packages seeking new maintainers

2019-07-29 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 29. 07. 19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_