ough.
> >
> > So, I'm orphaning system-auto-death. If no one steps up to take care of
> > it I'm going to issue an update which disables the cron job.
>
> I mentioned this in the bug, but preupgrade needs to know about the
> EOL date of a release too. Hence:
&g
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 09:24:40AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> After this bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663340
>
> I realize I'm not remembering to update the EOL date often enough.
>
> So, I'm orphaning system-auto-death. If no one steps up to ta
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:54 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 12/16/2010 06:43 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:33 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 12/16/2010 06:26 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Just a thought:
On 12/16/2010 06:43 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:33 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 12/16/2010 06:26 PM, seth vidal wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Just a thought: How about equipping a repo's metadata with some sort of
"expir
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:33 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 12/16/2010 06:26 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> Just a thought: How about equipping a repo's metadata with some sort of
> >> "expiration"/"best before" date, which yum etc. could u
On 12/16/2010 06:26 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 12/16/2010 03:18 PM, seth vidal wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 22:34 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:59:19PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I think I'll chan
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 12/16/2010 03:18 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 22:34 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:59:19PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >>> I think I'll change the f15 deadline to very-far-in-the-future
On 12/16/2010 03:18 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 22:34 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:59:19PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> I think I'll change the f15 deadline to very-far-in-the-future, and then
>>> when I invent some spare time, work on some of the
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 22:34 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:59:19PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > I think I'll change the f15 deadline to very-far-in-the-future, and then
> > when I invent some spare time, work on some of the other ideas for automatic
> > determination
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:59:19PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I think I'll change the f15 deadline to very-far-in-the-future, and then
> when I invent some spare time, work on some of the other ideas for automatic
> determination of the time. That's better than not having the package
> complete
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:34:30PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > > I suspect not b/c there's only one person reporting that their f13 or
> > > f14 system went offline today. :)
> > Well, maybe it's working *really well*. :)
> So, do you want to take over the pkg?
Yeah, okay.
I think I'll change th
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 20:24 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:09:50PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > > I guess the question is: Does *anyone* but me care?
> > I suspect not b/c there's only one person reporting that their f13 or
> > f14 system went offline today. :)
>
>
> We
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:09:50PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > I guess the question is: Does *anyone* but me care?
> I suspect not b/c there's only one person reporting that their f13 or
> f14 system went offline today. :)
Well, maybe it's working *really well*. :)
--
Matthew Miller
Senior S
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 12:07 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:16:54AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > maybe - but I have no interest in doing so.
> > If you want the pkg - you're welcome to do it but it's not useful to me.
>
> I guess the question is: Does *anyone* but me care
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:16:54AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> maybe - but I have no interest in doing so.
> If you want the pkg - you're welcome to do it but it's not useful to me.
I guess the question is: Does *anyone* but me care?
--
Matthew Miller
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional &
ough.
> >
> > So, I'm orphaning system-auto-death. If no one steps up to take care of
> > it I'm going to issue an update which disables the cron job.
>
> Could it be changed so that the deathdate is determined automatically when
> the package is installe
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 09:24:40AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> After this bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663340
>
> I realize I'm not remembering to update the EOL date often enough.
>
> So, I'm orphaning system-auto-death. If no one steps up to ta
After this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663340
I realize I'm not remembering to update the EOL date often enough.
So, I'm orphaning system-auto-death. If no one steps up to take care of
it I'm going to issue an update which disables the cron job.
-sv
--
18 matches
Mail list logo
