I know that you was going to orphan Slim, but I would like to ask you for some
additional help with it.
I found that slim currently works with pam but it looks like not properly.
In the March post in XFCE lists there is the message:
On 06/10/2011 07:04 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 09.06.2011, 13:40 +0400 schrieb Lucas:
>> What kind of relation between Xfce maintainers and SLIM.
>
> The Fedora Xfce SIG considered SLIM but we didn't use it because (at
> least at that time) it had some problems with ConsoleKi
Am Donnerstag, den 09.06.2011, 13:40 +0400 schrieb Lucas:
> What kind of relation between Xfce maintainers and SLIM.
The Fedora Xfce SIG considered SLIM but we didn't use it because (at
least at that time) it had some problems with ConsoleKit.
We are still trying to get rid of GDM but we are mo
On 06/09/2011 01:34 PM, Lucas wrote:
> On 06/09/2011 01:19 PM, Lucas wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >I'm not using this package and I have not checked its state before
>> >taking the ownership (which was mistake). It doesn't work for users who
>> >upgraded from F14 to F15 and I wasn't able to find out why
On 06/09/2011 01:19 PM, Lucas wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm not using this package and I have not checked its state before
> >taking the ownership (which was mistake). It doesn't work for users who
> >upgraded from F14 to F15 and I wasn't able to find out why exactly it
> >fails. There are also so
On 09/06/11 10:19, Lucas wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm not using this package and I have not checked its state before
> >taking the ownership (which was mistake). It doesn't work for users who
> >upgraded from F14 to F15 and I wasn't able to find out why exactly it
> >fails. There are also s
>Hi,
>
>I'm not using this package and I have not checked its state before
>taking the ownership (which was mistake). It doesn't work for users who
>upgraded from F14 to F15 and I wasn't able to find out why exactly it
>fails. There are also some bugs untouched for long time.
>
>To sum it u
Hi,
I'm not using this package and I have not checked its state before
taking the ownership (which was mistake). It doesn't work for users who
upgraded from F14 to F15 and I wasn't able to find out why exactly it
fails. There are also some bugs untouched for long time.
To sum it up, it is prob
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 07:09:30PM +0200, Lorenzo Villani wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 08/26/2010 03:29 PM, Petr Sabata wrote:
> >
> >> Looks like something I've been looking for ;)
> >> Taken. (F14 & rawhide)
>
> I can release ownership on F-12 and F-13 too,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/26/2010 03:29 PM, Petr Sabata wrote:
>
>> Looks like something I've been looking for ;)
>> Taken. (F14 & rawhide)
I can release ownership on F-12 and F-13 too, if you want.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Com
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:19:21PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
> It seems upstream released a new version one months ago.
>
> See
> http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2663
>
It's already in Fedora (F12+, testing).
>
> Chen Lei
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedorap
It seems upstream released a new version one months ago.
See
http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2663
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 02:21:31PM +0200, Lorenzo Villani wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> I'm orphaning the SLIM display manager because:
> - - Upstream is (mostly) dead¹;
> - - I find this software to be broken beyond relief;
> - - Up until 1.3.2 I had to maintain a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I'm orphaning the SLIM display manager because:
- - Upstream is (mostly) dead¹;
- - I find this software to be broken beyond relief;
- - Up until 1.3.2 I had to maintain a huge stack of more than ten
patches;
- - I'm not using it anymore;
Maintain
14 matches
Mail list logo
