On Monday, 23 August 2021 at 13:53, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi!
> Last year, I announced my intention to orphan openbabel. Several folks
> replied, but nobody said they wanted to take over as primary maintainer.
> In the end, I didn't actually orphan the package, but I didn't do any
Hi Dominik.
'openbabel' is still developed, i see.
I take it
On 8/23/21 1:53 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi!
Last year, I announced my intention to orphan openbabel. Several folks
replied, but nobody said they wanted to take over as primary maintainer.
In the end, I didn't actuall
Hi!
Last year, I announced my intention to orphan openbabel. Several folks
replied, but nobody said they wanted to take over as primary maintainer.
In the end, I didn't actually orphan the package, but I didn't do any
maintenance on it, either. So, this time I'm actually orphaning it
in a week. It'
Hi Zbigniew,
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:53 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:53:03AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> […]
> I think it makes sense to add a new 'openbabel3' package. Like Kevin wrote
> in the other mail, it seems likely that some packages will
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:53:03AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've finally managed to find some time and get the latest Open Babel
> snapshot to build in F32 and rawhide. The spec file is ugly with a
> bunch of comments still in it and I've realized that documentation
Hello everyone,
I've finally managed to find some time and get the latest Open Babel
snapshot to build in F32 and rawhide. The spec file is ugly with a
bunch of comments still in it and I've realized that documentation
upstream is lacking, especially concerning build options and bindings.
So far,
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> This is the porting guide:
> https://open-babel.readthedocs.io/en/latest/UseTheLibrary/migration.html#migrating-to-3-0
>
> It doesn't look too bad from a cursory look.
To me, this list looks like a classic incompatible major version of a
library that is no
On Thursday, 30 July 2020 at 19:18, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
[...]
> Given the time of the year in the Northern Hemisphere, do you think
> you could hold on to the package a little longer (e.g. until the
> beginning of September), so that people who are interested might get
> the chance to get o
On Friday, 31 July 2020 at 11:04, Kevin Kofler wrote:
[...]
> We will likely also need an openbabel2 compatibility package then, because I
> doubt that everything will build against OpenBabel 3 without non-trivial
> porting.
This is the porting guide:
https://open-babel.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> The next release of Molsketch is going to build against Open Babel
> 3.x, so I started working on updating the openbabel package around the
> time version 3.1.1 came out, which supposedly fixed some issues
> related to packaging on linux. Based on your spec file, I was
Hello Dominik and everyone else,
The next release of Molsketch is going to build against Open Babel
3.x, so I started working on updating the openbabel package around the
time version 3.1.1 came out, which supposedly fixed some issues
related to packaging on linux. Based on your spec file, I was t
Hi everyone,
I've finally admitted to myself that I have no time to take good care
of openbabel:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openbabel
It has one FTBFS bug in rawhide (related to cmake macro changes)
and two requests to update. One in Fedora to move to the recent 3.x
series and one for EPEL
12 matches
Mail list logo
