Re: Orphaning libunwind

2012-12-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Josh Boyer wrote: > Yes, I'm aware of that. At the moment, it is found because the library > is in Fedora. However, I don't want to build 3.7 perf against a library > that is orphaned and clearly not really supported. So I'm going to > disable it with NO_LIBUNWIND=1 and we can revisit perf with

Re: Orphaning libunwind

2012-11-26 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 02:48:00 +0100, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > But these are just implementation. Ideally we want every package that gets > released to the users to have a maintainer that is watching bug reports and > attempting to fix anything serious. There are serious bugs so that some cases are

Re: Orphaning libunwind

2012-11-26 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:44:24 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 26.11.12 11:23, Mat Booth (fed...@matbooth.co.uk) wrote: > > On 24 November 2012 07:40, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > as elfutils package is going to contain unwinder in its next release > > > orphaning > > > th

Re: Orphaning libunwind

2012-11-26 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Nov 26, 2012 8:22 AM, "Jan Kratochvil" wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:00:17 +0100, Josh Boyer wrote: > > If perf winds up getting stuck relying on an orphaned library for some > > non-trivial amount of time, > > AFAIK that is common in Fedora there are orphaned libraries in use for > a rele

Re: Orphaning libunwind

2012-11-26 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 26.11.12 11:23, Mat Booth (fed...@matbooth.co.uk) wrote: > On 24 November 2012 07:40, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > Hi, > > > > as elfutils package is going to contain unwinder in its next release > > orphaning > > the libunwind library. > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/nam

Re: Orphaning libunwind

2012-11-26 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:00:52AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:34:35AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > >> >> > If perf winds up getting stuck relying on an orphaned li

Re: Orphaning libunwind

2012-11-26 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:34:35AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote: >> >> > If perf winds up getting stuck relying on an orphaned library for some >> >> > non-trivial amount of time, >> >> >> >> AFAIK

Re: Orphaning libunwind

2012-11-26 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:34:35AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > >> > If perf winds up getting stuck relying on an orphaned library for some > >> > non-trivial amount of time, > >> > >> AFAIK that is common in Fedora there are orphaned libraries in

Re: Orphaning libunwind

2012-11-26 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote: >> > If perf winds up getting stuck relying on an orphaned library for some >> > non-trivial amount of time, >> >> AFAIK that is common in Fedora there are orphaned libraries in use for >> a release or two. >> >> >> > I'd rather just turn off libun

Re: Orphaning libunwind

2012-11-26 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:22:08PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:00:17 +0100, Josh Boyer wrote: > > So are you not orphaning libunwind until that is merged into the > > upstream kernel? > > To get the terminology right: > I am 'orphan

Re: Orphaning libunwind

2012-11-26 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:22:08 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:00:17 +0100, Josh Boyer wrote: > > So are you not orphaning libunwind until that is merged into the > > upstream kernel? > > To get the terminology right: > I am 'orphaning' i

Re: Orphaning libunwind

2012-11-26 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:00:17 +0100, Josh Boyer wrote: > So are you not orphaning libunwind until that is merged into the > upstream kernel? To get the terminology right: I am 'orphaning' it now. Later it may be 'obsolsted'. If I should keep it formally maintaining I

Re: Orphaning libunwind

2012-11-26 Thread Josh Boyer
6_64 > perf-0:3.7.0-0.rc6.git4.1.fc19.x86_64 > gperftools-libs-0:2.0-7.fc18.x86_64 > > (2) perf is being actively ported from libunwind API to elfutils API > with Jiri Olsa; but it is also not upstreamed yet: > git://git.jankratochvil.net/linux > unwind4-fix-ca

Re: Orphaning libunwind

2012-11-26 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:23:16 +0100, Mat Booth wrote: > Won't you need to retire it when elfutils obsoletes it? The development is not yet at that point, it may happen later: (1) elfutils needs to integrate it and get released first (January/February), being worked on with Mark Wielaard:

Re: Orphaning libunwind

2012-11-26 Thread Mat Booth
Won't you need to retire it when elfutils obsoletes it? On 24 November 2012 07:40, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > Hi, > > as elfutils package is going to contain unwinder in its next release orphaning > the libunwind library. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libunwind > > > Jan > --

Orphaning libunwind

2012-11-23 Thread Jan Kratochvil
Hi, as elfutils package is going to contain unwinder in its next release orphaning the libunwind library. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libunwind Jan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel