On 04/30/2014 12:07 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 04/07/2014 07:29 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> As of JDK8, OpenJDK can be cross-compiled. Not before time, either.
>
> It seems to me that support is fairly limited—you cannot compile Hotspot
> across different operating systems, but perhaps acr
On 04/07/2014 07:29 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
As of JDK8, OpenJDK can be cross-compiled. Not before time, either.
It seems to me that support is fairly limited—you cannot compile Hotspot
across different operating systems, but perhaps across CPU architectures.
In the context of GCJ obsolesce
> > Ok the patch worked fine for building on my F20, which I did as a test,
> > however it failed the build in rawhide.
> >
> > The only clue I can get is this:
> > configure: WARNING: unable to include
> >
> What's in the configure log file regarding this?
This is solved now, AFAIK. The configu
On 04/14/2014 07:32 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Ok the patch worked fine for building on my F20, which I did as a test,
however it failed the build in rawhide.
The only clue I can get is this:
configure: WARNING: unable to include
What's in the configure log file regarding this?
--
devel mailing li
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 09:44 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote:
> > [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is
> > substantial work I will just remove the java binding and ask rel eng to
> > pull the subpackage.
>
> You ca
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 09:24 +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
> On 14 April 2014 08:44, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>
> > On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is
> > > substantial work I will just remove the java binding an
Thanks a lot,
I will push this patch and rebuild in rawhide.
Simo.
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 09:44 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote:
> > [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is
> > substantial work I will just remove the
On Mon 14 Apr 2014 10:24:46 AM CEST Mat Booth wrote:
> On 14 April 2014 08:44, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>
>> On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote:
>> > [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is
>> > substantial work I will just remove the java binding and
On 14 April 2014 08:44, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote:
> > [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is
> > substantial work I will just remove the java binding and ask rel eng to
> > pull the subpackage.
>
> You can't just "
On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote:
> [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is
> substantial work I will just remove the java binding and ask rel eng to
> pull the subpackage.
You can't just "pull" packages. You'll have to properly "Obsoletes:
lasso-java" i
ress this.
> >>
> >> I will be orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj in Fedora on April 8th. If anyone
> >> wants to take over, please let me know. Please do keep in mind though
> >> that we really should just remove GCJ (despite the effect it will have
> >> on
* Andrew Haley [2014-04-07 13:29]:
> On 04/07/2014 03:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> There have been a few discussions about this in the past but no action.
> >> With feature freeze approaching for F21, I think this is a good time to
> >> address this.
> >&
On 04/07/2014 03:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> There have been a few discussions about this in the past but no action.
>> With feature freeze approaching for F21, I think this is a good time to
>> address this.
>>
>> I will be orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj in Fedora on
> There have been a few discussions about this in the past but no action.
> With feature freeze approaching for F21, I think this is a good time to
> address this.
>
> I will be orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj in Fedora on April 8th. If anyone
> wants to take over, please let me know.
- Original Message -
> From: "Deepak Bhole"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2014 2:01:18 PM
> Subject: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
>
> Hi,
>
> There have been a few discussions about this in the past but no action.
> With
Hi,
There have been a few discussions about this in the past but no action.
With feature freeze approaching for F21, I think this is a good time to
address this.
I will be orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj in Fedora on April 8th. If anyone
wants to take over, please let me know. Please do keep in mind
16 matches
Mail list logo
