On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> I've taken ownership of this package and will see what I can do to get
> it building again.
Here's the review request for the new dependency:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705585
Let me know if I can review something in return.
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Thomas Spura wrote:
> The latest version 1.2.0 is now complaining with:
> ERROR: Fflas-Ffpack not found!
> and I gave up, because linbox is quite hacky.
>
> Maybe it would be better to use the sage sourcepackage of linbox and
> not packaging it from the upstream w
On Sat, 14 May 2011 21:14:20 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Thomas Spura
> wrote:
> > * linbox:
> > Required for SAGE [1], but FTBFS since a while and the new
> > version now requires another package, not yet in fedora.
> > This is hard to mai
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Thomas Spura wrote:
> * linbox:
> Required for SAGE [1], but FTBFS since a while and the new
> version now requires another package, not yet in fedora. This
> is hard to maintain, because of many multilib problems/hacks
>
Hi list,
I'm orphaning gbirthday and linbox, because I either don't use them
anymore or it's too much work to integrate it into fedora...
* gbirthday:
I don't use it anymore, and it has some SQL bugs open (I
don't use SQL either
