On 03/17/2011 06:17 PM, Nicola Soranzo wrote:
> Alle giovedì 17 marzo 2011, Richard Hughes ha scritto:
>> On 16 March 2011 17:16, Michel Alexandre Salim
>>
>> wrote:
>>> I wonder why gimp depends on hal directly. For scanner, perhaps?
>>
>> It was for tablet support, but the code could never have
Alle giovedì 17 marzo 2011, Richard Hughes ha scritto:
> On 16 March 2011 17:16, Michel Alexandre Salim
>
> wrote:
> > I wonder why gimp depends on hal directly. For scanner, perhaps?
>
> It was for tablet support, but the code could never have worked. We've
> dropped the hal and gnome-vfs2 deps
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 10:16 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 16 March 2011 17:16, Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> > I wonder why gimp depends on hal directly. For scanner, perhaps?
>
> It was for tablet support, but the code could never have worked. We've
> dropped the hal and gnome-vfs2 deps
On 16 March 2011 17:16, Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
> I wonder why gimp depends on hal directly. For scanner, perhaps?
It was for tablet support, but the code could never have worked. We've
dropped the hal and gnome-vfs2 deps from gimp in rawhide now.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
On Wednesday, March 16, 2011 06:36:53 pm Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 12:42 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > I'm planning to orphan the hal and hal-info packages in F15 and and
> > retire them in rawhide.
> >
> > HAL has been dead upstream for 3 years now, and all development has
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 12:42 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> I'm planning to orphan the hal and hal-info packages in F15 and and
> retire them in rawhide.
>
> HAL has been dead upstream for 3 years now, and all development has
> moved into udev, and the u* daemons like upower, udisks and urfkill.
>
On 03/15/2011 09:30 PM, Andy Lawrence wrote:
> More packages using/tagged for hal-libs? Or perhaps just dependencies that
> will need to be fixed.
>
> Removing:
> hal-libs
> Removing for dependencies:
..
> gimp
..
I wonder why gimp depends on hal directly. For scanner, perhaps?
openSUSE seems
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 16:28 +0100, Nicola Soranzo wrote:
> Alle mercoledì 16 marzo 2011, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 15:50 +0100, Nicola Soranzo wrote:
> > > See also the Feature page:
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HalRemoval
> > >
> > > I have been
Alle mercoledì 16 marzo 2011, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
> On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 15:50 +0100, Nicola Soranzo wrote:
> > See also the Feature page:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HalRemoval
> >
> > I have been updating the dependency list there for almost a year.
>
> Wow, you've
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 15:50 +0100, Nicola Soranzo wrote:
> See also the Feature page:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HalRemoval
>
> I have been updating the dependency list there for almost a year.
Wow, you've done a nice job there, thanks for keeping that uptodate.
I think for F1
Richard Hughes wrote:
> I'm planning to orphan the hal and hal-info packages in F15 and and
> retire them in rawhide.
>
> HAL has been dead upstream for 3 years now, and all development has
> moved into udev, and the u* daemons like upower, udisks and urfkill.
> The original maintainer and most of
On 16 March 2011 03:12, Peter Robinson wrote:
> That package is obsolete anyway as well so the apps should be
> migrating away, I doubt that will be for F-15.
Agreed.
I think it's also sane to retire gnome-vfs2 for F16 too.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Andy Lawrence (dr.die...@gmail.com) said:
>> More packages using/tagged for hal-libs? Or perhaps just dependencies that
>> will need to be fixed.
>
> This is a cascade via gnome-vfs2; most all of these don't require HAL
> directly.
That p
On 03/15/2011 01:30 PM, Andy Lawrence wrote:
> More packages using/tagged for hal-libs? Or perhaps just dependencies
> that will need to be fixed.
>
>
> coolkey
Coolkey depends on pcsc-lite (see below).
> pcsc-lite
> pcsc-lite-ccid
Kalev just fixed these two in rawhide by updating to 1.7.0
>
Andy Lawrence (dr.die...@gmail.com) said:
> More packages using/tagged for hal-libs? Or perhaps just dependencies that
> will need to be fixed.
This is a cascade via gnome-vfs2; most all of these don't require HAL
directly.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin
More packages using/tagged for hal-libs? Or perhaps just dependencies that
will need to be fixed.
Removing:
hal-libs
Removing for dependencies:
at-spi-python
coolkey
dia
eclipse-jdt
eclipse-pde
eclipse-platform
eclipse-rcp
eclipse-swt
firefox
gimp
gimp-data-extras
gimp-help
gimp-hel
On Tuesday, March 15, 2011 01:42:19 pm Richard Hughes wrote:
> I'm planning to orphan the hal and hal-info packages in F15 and and
> retire them in rawhide.
> matahari-0:0.4.0-0.1.8003b6c.git.fc15.1.x86_64
The old code, we should update Fedora package to Sigar based version but I'm
not
sure the
On 15 March 2011 13:21, Kalev Lember wrote:
> The list above is missing some packages that depend on hal-libs. Below
> should be a more complete list of the builds that need
> one of the hal subpackages:
Eeek, thanks.
> gnome-device-manager-0.2-6.fc15
I *think* this is dead upstream.
> gnome-p
On 03/15/2011 02:58 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Does anyone know what the future has in store for pcsc-lite I dont see
> the point in writing a systemd service file for it if it's going to be
> deprecated.
pcsc-lite isn't going anywhere.
Last week pcsc-lite upstream released 1.7.0, whi
On 03/15/2011 02:42 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> I'm planning to orphan the hal and hal-info packages in F15 and and
> retire them in rawhide.
>
> HAL has been dead upstream for 3 years now, and all development has
> moved into udev, and the u* daemons like upower, udisks and urfkill.
> The origina
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:42:19PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> I'm planning to orphan the hal and hal-info packages in F15 and and
> retire them in rawhide.
>
> HAL has been dead upstream for 3 years now, and all development has
> moved into udev, and the u* daemons like upower, udisks and urfk
On 03/15/2011 12:42 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> The things that depend on HAL in F15 seem to be:
>
> beldi-0:0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64
> blueman-0:1.21-7.fc15.x86_64
> exaile-0:0.3.2.1-1.fc15.noarch
> gnome-device-manager-libs-0:0.2-6.fc15.i686
> libconcord-0:0.23-2.fc15.i686
> lxsession-0:0.4.5-2.fc15.
I'm planning to orphan the hal and hal-info packages in F15 and and
retire them in rawhide.
HAL has been dead upstream for 3 years now, and all development has
moved into udev, and the u* daemons like upower, udisks and urfkill.
The original maintainer and most of the original team want HAL dead.
23 matches
Mail list logo
