Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Sat, 23 Feb 2013, Matthew Miller wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:17:57PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: it's not under my control anymore - but the idea of python-requests and its deps pulled into @core does not fill me with joy. Sooo $ rpm -qR python-requests|grep -v ^rpmlib\( ca-certi

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: >> >> I have taken the ownership for now. I was cleaning up some old email when I ran across an email from Tomáš Smetana that python-pycurl has been incorporated into RHEL as of RHEL6, so

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:53:53AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 04:47 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > It's relatively big for a core package (couple of megabytes, give or take). > > And curl is required by a number of *other* things, and it's pretty nice to > > hav

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 04:47 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:17:57PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > > it's not under my control anymore - but the idea of python-requests > > and its deps pulled into @core does not fill me with joy. > > Sooo > > $ rpm -qR python-requests|

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:17:57PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > it's not under my control anymore - but the idea of python-requests > and its deps pulled into @core does not fill me with joy. Sooo $ rpm -qR python-requests|grep -v ^rpmlib\( ca-certificates python(abi) = 2.7 (And ca-certificat

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > > I have taken the ownership for now. Thanks! -- Jeff Ollie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Friday, February 22, 2013 14:54:04 Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > Excellent! Jeffrey, will you be picking python-pycurl up again, then? > > No. While this was an easy fix that was actually in another package, > PycURL has other problems. I thin

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > Excellent! Jeffrey, will you be picking python-pycurl up again, then? No. While this was an easy fix that was actually in another package, PycURL has other problems. I think that the most obvious one is handling errors encountered by libcu

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Friday, February 22, 2013 12:02:47 Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > > The final straw is that the package failed to build in the latest mass > > rebuild: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914411 > > Thanks for heads up! This is a b

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Friday, February 22, 2013 12:02:47 Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > The final straw is that the package failed to build in the latest mass > rebuild: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914411 Thanks for heads up! This is a bug in the latest upstream release of libcurl. I will apply the ups

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > >> I'm not familiar with it, nor is it in Fedora yet, but would curlish work? >> >> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/**curlish/ >> >> > > It's calling out to curl

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Jon Ciesla wrote: I'm not familiar with it, nor is it in Fedora yet, but would curlish work? https://pypi.python.org/pypi/curlish/ It's calling out to curl via subprocess - that doesn't feel like a good idea -sv -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:02 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: >>> On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > Perso

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:02 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> >>> On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: >>> Personally, I'd like to see Yum move away from PycURL but if someone

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:02 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: Personally, I'd like to see Yum move away from PycURL but if someone wants to take over upstream development more power to them. I use pycurl as

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:02 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > > Personally, I'd like to see Yum move away from PycURL but if someone > > wants to take over upstream development more power to them. > > > I use pycurl as well. Do you have a suggestion for an

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: Personally, I'd like to see Yum move away from PycURL but if someone wants to take over upstream development more power to them. I use pycurl as well. Do you have a suggestion for an alternative package to use that has similar capabilities? -- deve

Orphaning PycURL

Hello, I am going to be orphaning the PycURL package... Upstream is dead, the last new release was in 2008. Yet, PycURL is a critical part of Fedora as Yum uses it to download metadata and packages. The final straw is that the package failed to build in the latest mass rebuild: https://bugzill