Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-31 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 22:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > (Is it actually impossible for the vesa driver to work after > KMS has kicked in, btw, or is it just something that doesn't work at > present?) Right now, it may work or it may not. Typically the vesa bios assumes it's the only thing th

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 23:02 +0200, François Cami wrote: > >> Also, an RFE: X should back out and use VESA if the auto-detected, or > >> configured, driver fails after 3 attempts instead of attempting to start > >> 30 times and failing 30 times. A desktop notification should be > >> triggered that

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-29 Thread François Cami
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 13:32 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> Kevin Kofler wrote: >> > 3. What if you can't bring up X in the first place? (You can't run gnome- >> > display-properties if you can't get into X. system-config-display >> >

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-29 Thread Matej Cepl
Kevin Kofler, Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:19:51 +0200: >> I believe KDE should have something equivalent ... don't you have a >> tool for managing multiple screens/heads? > > It doesn't do systemwide/permanent settings. (But I think the GNOME tool > also doesn't implement that at this time.) Oh sorry, no

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-29 Thread drago01
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Matej Cepl wrote: >> I believe KDE should have something equivalent ... don't you have a tool >> for managing multiple screens/heads? > > It doesn't do systemwide/permanent settings. (But I think the GNOME tool > also doesn't implement that at

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-28 Thread Kevin Kofler
Matej Cepl wrote: > I believe KDE should have something equivalent ... don't you have a tool > for managing multiple screens/heads? It doesn't do systemwide/permanent settings. (But I think the GNOME tool also doesn't implement that at this time.) Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list dev

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-27 Thread Matej Cepl
Kevin Kofler, Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:59:00 +0200: > 1. Not everyone uses GNOME. I believe KDE should have something equivalent ... don't you have a tool for managing multiple screens/heads? > 3. What if you can't bring up X in the first place? Somebody suggested Xorg -configure but the main point

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 05:28:31PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > system-config-display depends on gtk, so it's all a matter of degree. > > No, I would never mention Gtk as a dep. So, like I said, it's a matter of degree. This is all

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 03:59:06PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: >> > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> >> 1. Not everyone uses GNOME. >> > >> > Demonstrably

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 15:59 -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Adam Jackson wrote: > >> > Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic > >> > configuration too

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 03:59:06PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> 1. Not everyone uses GNOME. > > > > Demonstrably true, but I don't see how it's relevant. > > You suggested `gno

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Adam Jackson wrote: >> > Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic >> > configuration tool.  gnome-display-properties should have a "set as >> > default" butt

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Jackson wrote: > > Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic > > configuration tool. gnome-display-properties should have a "set as > > default" button. > > Uh… > 1. Not everyone uses GNOME. Demonstrably tru

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:20:23PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > 3. What if you can't bring up X in the first place? > > > > That's an X bug. File a bug. > > I wonder how usable Bugzilla is in Lynx with 80×25 characters. Works absolutely f

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Björn Persson
Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Kevin Kofler wrote: > > 3. What if you can't bring up X in the first place? > > That's an X bug. File a bug. I wonder how usable Bugzilla is in Lynx with 80×25 characters. Björn Persson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel m

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Also, an RFE: X should back out and use VESA if the auto-detected, or > configured, driver fails after 3 attempts instead of attempting to start > 30 times and failing 30 times. A desktop notification should be > triggered that says "Hey! X failed and you're using a bas

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 20:27 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> 2. What about systemwide settings? (system-config-display did those.) > > > > What system wide settings? > > The settings in xorg.conf which apply to all users. Presumably, a "make > default" button would be per use

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 13:32 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Kevin Kofler wrote: > > 3. What if you can't bring up X in the first place? (You can't run gnome- > > display-properties if you can't get into X. system-config-display --reconfig > > was a way to fix such problems.) > > That's an X bu

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:59 +0200 > Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Adam Jackson wrote: >> > Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic >> > configuration tool.  gnome-display-properties should have a "set as >> > default" butto

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Kevin Kofler wrote: > 3. What if you can't bring up X in the first place? (You can't run gnome- > display-properties if you can't get into X. system-config-display --reconfig > was a way to fix such problems.) That's an X bug. File a bug. Also, an RFE: X should back out and use VESA if the auto-d

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 10:59 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 01:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > On 08/26/2010 01:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > I don't have time for it, and I think it's fundamentally misguided. If > > > someone else feels like owning it, go wild. > > > > >

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> 2. What about systemwide settings? (system-config-display did those.) > > What system wide settings? The settings in xorg.conf which apply to all users. Presumably, a "make default" button would be per user. Or would it be for the systemwide xorg.conf? Personally, I'd find

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:59 +0200 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Jackson wrote: > > Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic > > configuration tool. gnome-display-properties should have a "set as > > default" button. > > Uh… > 1. Not everyone uses GNOME. Very true. I woul

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Jackson wrote: > Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic > configuration tool. gnome-display-properties should have a "set as > default" button. Uh… 1. Not everyone uses GNOME. 2. What about systemwide settings? (system-config-display did those.) 3. What if you c

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-26 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 01:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/26/2010 01:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > I don't have time for it, and I think it's fundamentally misguided. If > > someone else feels like owning it, go wild. > > > > This will probably also require access to the upstream repo, so,

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-25 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/26/2010 01:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > I don't have time for it, and I think it's fundamentally misguided. If > someone else feels like owning it, go wild. > > This will probably also require access to the upstream repo, so, do > speak up if you take it so we can sort that out. Assuming n

Orphaned package: system-config-display

2010-08-25 Thread Adam Jackson
I don't have time for it, and I think it's fundamentally misguided. If someone else feels like owning it, go wild. This will probably also require access to the upstream repo, so, do speak up if you take it so we can sort that out. - ajax signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed m