On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:39:10PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Good point. Maybe it is the right time to drop the db package
> naming scheme completely and introduce new package "libdb" and leave the db4
> as is in the 4.8.26 state.
>
> I'm on it.
Just for the record, the review request is here
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:02:37PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 06/04/10 08:59, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Does this mean that db4-devel buildreqs will need changing to either
> db5-devel or compat-db?
Good point. Maybe it is the right time to drop the db package
naming scheme completely and intro
On 06/04/10 08:59, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is just a heads-up that Oracle DB 5.0.21 was released some
> time ago and will occur in rawhide in case that testing of it goes
> well. Rawhide build is expected by the end of this week. BDB 4.8.26
> will be moved to compat-db so library depend
Hi,
this is just a heads-up that Oracle DB 5.0.21 was released some
time ago and will occur in rawhide in case that testing of it goes
well. Rawhide build is expected by the end of this week. BDB 4.8.26
will be moved to compat-db so library dependencies should remain
satisfied.
Cheers,
Jindrich
