On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> If you spend the time to figure out how to make these work, the FPC would
> love to have the Guidelines that deal with Filtering updated. There's
> a start of a draft linked from this ticket:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/76
>
>
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 04:46:46PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > For rpm >= 4.9, there's __provides_exclude and __provides_exclude_from
> > which I believe don't have those problems.
> >
> > http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/DependencyGenerator#
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> For rpm >= 4.9, there's __provides_exclude and __provides_exclude_from
> which I believe don't have those problems.
>
> http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/DependencyGenerator#TweakingDependencyGenerators
Oh, excellent! Thanks, Ville. That's F1
On 07/06/2011 11:33 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoReqProv_%28draft%29#Removing_items_from_the_provides_stream_.28post-scan_filtering.29
>
> Or rather
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndR
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 23:39 +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 13:09:41 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > .. but on the other hand, the same logic applies in the opposite
> > > sense: if something requires OpenMPI's libotf.so.0, also the
> > > truetype libotf will satisfy the req
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 13:09:41 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> > .. but on the other hand, the same logic applies in the opposite
> > sense: if something requires OpenMPI's libotf.so.0, also the
> > truetype libotf will satisfy the requirement. (Although openmpi
> > apps typically link to a half a do
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoReqProv_%28draft%29#Removing_items_from_the_provides_stream_.28post-scan_filtering.29
Or rather
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering,
and I can't use that in a couple o
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 15:24 -0500, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
> > Well, packages get an auto-generated Requires: for libotf.so.0. Anything
> > that claims to provide libotf.so.0 will satisfy this. The most correct
> > solution is simply for openmpi to stop claiming to provide libotf.so.0
> > because, f
Adam Williamson wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:54:48PM -0700:
> On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 22:46 +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:39:14 -0700
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 20:03 +1000, Amit Saha wrote:
> > > > So, this library is missing. However, this s
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 23:02 +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:54:48 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > It's certainly not the same libotf, since OpenMPI does not have
> > > *anything* to do with truetype fonts.
> > >
> > > Even though the library is installed in a non-system
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:54:48 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> > It's certainly not the same libotf, since OpenMPI does not have
> > *anything* to do with truetype fonts.
> >
> > Even though the library is installed in a non-system directory,
> > applications that link against libotf will get an aut
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 22:46 +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:39:14 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 20:03 +1000, Amit Saha wrote:
> > > So, this library is missing. However, this should have been
> > > installed as its a dependency, right?
> > >
> > > I
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:39:14 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 20:03 +1000, Amit Saha wrote:
> > So, this library is missing. However, this should have been
> > installed as its a dependency, right?
> >
> > It can be seen that there are two providers listed for libotf.so.0.
> >
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 20:03 +1000, Amit Saha wrote:
> Hello all:
>
> I am hoping it is OK to discuss this here. I came across this problem
> when I was building a custom spin where the kickstart file installs
> 'openmpi' before 'emacs'.
>
> When I start emacs, here is what I get:
>
> $emacs
> em
Hello all:
I am hoping it is OK to discuss this here. I came across this problem
when I was building a custom spin where the kickstart file installs
'openmpi' before 'emacs'.
When I start emacs, here is what I get:
$emacs
emacs: error while loading shared libraries: libotf.so.0: cannot open
shar
15 matches
Mail list logo