On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 01:29 +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 19:25:57 GMT, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Possibly Firefox Sync? That seems like the framework/repository which
> > seems to have the best shot of becoming 'The Sync Thing' for F/OSS, if
> > anywhere. It's intentionally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 19:25:57 GMT, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Possibly Firefox Sync? That seems like the framework/repository which
> seems to have the best shot of becoming 'The Sync Thing' for F/OSS, if
> anywhere. It's intentionally written to be
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 17:16 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2012 17:04:52 -0400
> Neal Becker wrote:
>
> > You know what was the painless part of this re-install? After firing
> > up google chrome, I didn't need to reinstall anything for it. It's
> > all synced with gmail.
> >
> > I
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> You know what was the painless part of this re-install? After firing up
> google
> chrome, I didn't need to reinstall anything for it. It's all synced with
> gmail.
>
> I find myself wishing that all my fedora packages could be restored ju
On Tue, 29 May 2012 17:04:52 -0400
Neal Becker wrote:
> You know what was the painless part of this re-install? After firing
> up google chrome, I didn't need to reinstall anything for it. It's
> all synced with gmail.
>
> I find myself wishing that all my fedora packages could be restored
> j
You know what was the painless part of this re-install? After firing up google
chrome, I didn't need to reinstall anything for it. It's all synced with gmail.
I find myself wishing that all my fedora packages could be restored just like
that.
Oh sure, there's a few methods for automaticing in
