On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:22:10PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On February 25, 2020 3:38 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >
> > In the previous mass build LWT FTBFS because the tests failed on POWER
> > and s/390 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1792780). There is also a new
> > ver
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:04:42PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Yeah, because the updates-testing activation happened, which means
> that just submitting builds is not enough anymore.
> If you did things "normally", you'd need to create buildroot overrides
> for each build, wait, submit the n
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:46:27AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> This is where I might need help. I have a few questions:
>
> - There was something go on with Bodhi a few days ago which meant
>that you didn't want me to start this. Can I start now?
We were enabling it on tuesday an
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:47 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 08:56:04AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > OCaml 4.10.0 was released over the weekend.
> >
> > We currently have OCaml 4.10.0 beta 1 in Rawhide. It's not that far
> > away from 4.10.0. Unfortunately since
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 08:56:04AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> OCaml 4.10.0 was released over the weekend.
>
> We currently have OCaml 4.10.0 beta 1 in Rawhide. It's not that far
> away from 4.10.0. Unfortunately since building beta 1, Fedora 32 was
> forked from Rawhide so we now have th
[This is mainly a note-to-self so I know what the problems
are next time]
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:53:37PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> I may have caused you a problem with the ocaml-ounit update I
> requested. Now we have ocaml-ounit requiring ocaml-dune to build, and
> ocaml-dune requiring oca
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:53:37PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 1:57 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > * z3 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792740
>
> Actually, z3 should build. I checked in a workaround. The bug is
> still open to remind me to figure out an
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:22:10PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On February 25, 2020 3:38 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >
> > In the previous mass build LWT FTBFS because the tests failed on POWER
> > and s/390 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1792780). There is also a new
> > ver
> On February 25, 2020 3:38 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> In the previous mass build LWT FTBFS because the tests failed on POWER
> and s/390 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1792780). There is also a new
> version of LWT (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1755859). The new version
> is noted as an
In the previous mass build LWT FTBFS because the tests failed on POWER
and s/390 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1792780). There is also a new
version of LWT (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1755859). The new version
is noted as an API break, although I don't know how that will affect
other packages.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:53:37PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 1:57 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > * z3 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792740
>
> Actually, z3 should build. I checked in a workaround. The bug is
> still open to remind me to figure out an
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:36:41AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:27:44AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 9:57 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > OCaml 4.10.0 was released over the weekend.
> > >
> > > We currently have OCaml 4.10.0 beta
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 1:57 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> * z3 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792740
Actually, z3 should build. I checked in a workaround. The bug is
still open to remind me to figure out and fix the real problem.
> coq and friends failed last time, but I beli
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:27:44AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 9:57 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > OCaml 4.10.0 was released over the weekend.
> >
> > We currently have OCaml 4.10.0 beta 1 in Rawhide. It's not that far
> > away from 4.10.0. Unfortunately since b
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 9:57 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> OCaml 4.10.0 was released over the weekend.
>
> We currently have OCaml 4.10.0 beta 1 in Rawhide. It's not that far
> away from 4.10.0. Unfortunately since building beta 1, Fedora 32 was
> forked from Rawhide so we now have the beta 1
OCaml 4.10.0 was released over the weekend.
We currently have OCaml 4.10.0 beta 1 in Rawhide. It's not that far
away from 4.10.0. Unfortunately since building beta 1, Fedora 32 was
forked from Rawhide so we now have the beta 1 build in Fedora 32 as
well.
Hopefully the plan is as follows:
(1) R
16 matches
Mail list logo
