Non-responsive Package Maintainer for Cockpit Composer

2022-07-27 Thread Jacob Kozol
Hello all! Does anyone know how to contact Anthony McInerney (bofh80 )? I have tried to reach out via email but have not received a response. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111630 Thank you, Jacob Kozol https://accounts.fedoraproject

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer - snakeyaml

2021-09-26 Thread Stefan Bluhm
19:24:36 Betreff: Re: Non-responsive package maintainer - snakeyaml On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 6:45 PM Stefan Bluhm wrote: > > Hello, > > I am following the non-responsive package maintainer process for "snakeyaml": > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_no

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer - snakeyaml

2021-09-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 6:45 PM Stefan Bluhm wrote: > > Hello, > > I am following the non-responsive package maintainer process for "snakeyaml": > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/ > > Bugzill

Non-responsive package maintainer - snakeyaml

2021-09-26 Thread Stefan Bluhm
Hello, I am following the non-responsive package maintainer process for "snakeyaml": https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/ Bugzilla asking for response: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007971 Bugzilla asking for

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer - Ray Strode (halfline), Plymouth package

2018-10-02 Thread mcatanzaro
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 1:17 AM, fedora201...@nuclearsunshine.com wrote: Hi Ray, unfortunately in some cases it doesn't though. It's currently completely breaking boot with amdgpu+LUKS, and before that for several months under amdgpu it was not echoing LUKS characters to screen or otherwise updat

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer - Ray Strode (halfline), Plymouth package

2018-10-01 Thread fedora2018q2
On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 16:52 -0400, Ray Strode wrote: > Hi, > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:29 PM Stephen < > fedora201...@nuclearsunshine.com> wrote: > > The maintainer for Plymouth, Ray Strode (halfline), is not > > addressing > > its bugs on RHBZ (one response all year on a single bug, accepting > > a

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer - Ray Strode (halfline), Plymouth package

2018-10-01 Thread Ray Strode
Hi, On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:29 PM Stephen wrote: > The maintainer for Plymouth, Ray Strode (halfline), is not addressing > its bugs on RHBZ (one response all year on a single bug, accepting a > patch), including showstopper bugs that are preventing boot entirely in > some instances. I'm around, b

Non-responsive package maintainer - Ray Strode (halfline), Plymouth package

2018-10-01 Thread Stephen
The maintainer for Plymouth, Ray Strode (halfline), is not addressing its bugs on RHBZ (one response all year on a single bug, accepting a patch), including showstopper bugs that are preventing boot entirely in some instances. Per https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsi

Non-responsive package maintainer process - libprojectM

2016-02-13 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hello  I wrote in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827397 more than a month  I'd like update to last version 2.1 that have 3 years, now the we got a FTBFS , https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13 07730 Best regards,  -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproj

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-13 Thread Raphael Groner
Another problem package cicku has to react in reasonable short time for is now docky with FTBFS in rawhide cause of gcc6: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307430 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Jeff Backus
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Johannes Lips wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to formally send a mail requesting some feedback from cicku > regarding the maintenance of the backintime package. > There is one open bug, which requests an update [1] and additionally a > trac ticket [2] was also

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Johannes Lips wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Johannes Lips >> > >> You make a lot of assumptions in that statement. People filter email >> quite a bit and relying on bugzilla mail alone is not sufficient. >> >> I find it ironic that your original emai

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Johannes Lips
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Johannes Lips wrote: > > You make a lot of assumptions in that statement. People filter email > quite a bit and relying on bugzilla mail alone is not sufficient. > > I find it ironic that your original email said "I would like to > formally send a mail request

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Josh Boyer > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Johannes Lips >> wrote: >> > Dear all, >> > >> > I would like to formally send a mail requesting some feedback from cicku >> > regarding the maintena

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Johannes Lips wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Johannes Lips >> > >> Did you actually email cicku directly? I don't see him on CC. >> > Well, apparently I didn't add him to this e-mail, but he should have received > enough notifications from bugzilla a

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Johannes Lips
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Johannes Lips wrote: > > Did you actually email cicku directly? I don't see him on CC. > Well, apparently I didn't add him to this e-mail, but he should have received enough notifications from bugzilla already. Additionally from someone who maintains more th

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Johannes Lips > wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I would like to formally send a mail requesting some feedback from cicku > regarding the maintenance of the backintime package. > > Did you actually email cicku dire

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Johannes Lips wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to formally send a mail requesting some feedback from cicku > regarding the maintenance of the backintime package. Did you actually email cicku directly? I don't see him on CC. josh -- devel mailing list devel@l

Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Johannes Lips
Dear all, I would like to formally send a mail requesting some feedback from cicku regarding the maintenance of the backintime package. There is one open bug, which requests an update [1] and additionally a trac ticket [2] was also opened, not by me. I can see, that with an upgrade to later ver

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer (affix)

2014-10-09 Thread Brandon Vincent
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote: > I think you should probably ignore the fact that Affix happens to be the > first point of contact, and instead email "peter" or "jpo" who are the > active maintainers. I've notified them multiple times as well. BZ assigns the ticket to the lis

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer (affix)

2014-10-09 Thread Jamie Nguyen
On 09/10/14 06:28, Brandon Vincent wrote: > Over the past month, I have tried contacting Keiran Smith (affix) in > regards to nagios with no success [1]. > > Is anyone aware to his present status in regards to the Fedora Project > or possibly have an alternative method to reach him? Strangely, no

Non-responsive package maintainer (affix)

2014-10-08 Thread Brandon Vincent
All, Over the past month, I have tried contacting Keiran Smith (affix) in regards to nagios with no success [1]. Is anyone aware to his present status in regards to the Fedora Project or possibly have an alternative method to reach him? [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145830 Th

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer

2012-04-05 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote: >> >>   Hi Jon, >> >> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote: >>> > >>> >   I would like to call your attention to

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer

2012-04-05 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote: > >   Hi Jon, > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote: >> > >> >   I would like to call your attention to the following bug: >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer

2012-04-05 Thread Caghan Demirci
Hi Jon, On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote: > > > > I would like to call your attention to the following bug: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771262 > > > > The EL6 branch 0.5.2 and EL5 has 0.4.3 in git a

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer

2012-04-05 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote: > >   Hi everyone! > >   I would like to call your attention to the following bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771262 > >   What is required is a build of a small and simple package for EPEL. > However, I am unable to contact

Non-responsive package maintainer

2012-04-05 Thread Caghan Demirci
Hi everyone! I would like to call your attention to the following bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771262 What is required is a build of a small and simple package for EPEL. However, I am unable to contact the maintainer for a long time, by any means. Could another mainta