Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-07-28 Thread Doug Ledford
On Sat, 2014-07-26 at 11:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > libibverbs > libmlx4 > libmthca Taken. -- Doug Ledford GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproje

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-07-28 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Sat, 2014-07-26 at 11:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > The following packages are looking for a new point of contact on at > least one branch: > > babl > gegl I've taken these two. Nils -- Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase Red Hat a lit

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-07-28 Thread Tomas Hozza
- Original Message - > From: "Kevin Fenzi" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 7:17:24 PM > Subject: Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji) > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:01:33 -0600 > Kevin Fenzi wrote: >

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-07-27 Thread Jan Chaloupka
On 07/26/2014 07:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:01:33 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:03:30 +0800 Christopher Meng wrote: My opinion is, you should only comaintain what you want, not take over other's packages. If FESCo member could give consent of adding

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-07-27 Thread Martin Preisler
- Original Message - > From: "Kevin Fenzi" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 7:17:24 PM > Subject: Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji) > > [snip] > xcompmgr Taken. Should be low-traffic but com

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-07-26 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 07/26/2014 11:17 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Sorry for the long delay here. ;( There was a issue with the pkgdb2 api > to do this, then I was traveling, etc. > > It's now been done. > > The following packages are looking for a new point of contact on at > least one branch: > > (Note that many

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-07-26 Thread nonamedotc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/26/2014 12:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > atlas babl bibletime cln clucene exaile exempi galternatives gegl > gparted grads libctl libibverbs libmlx4 libmthca libqalculate > mpich mpich2 nautilus-actions ncview netcdf o3read qalculate-gtk > qal

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-07-26 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 00:15 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi, Hi, > Given that Deji Akingunola is maintainer of a couple of high-profile > packages, I'd like to double-check whether really no-one knows how to > reach him. The packages he is maintainer for are: > > atlas > babl > bibletime > cln >

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-07-26 Thread Sandro Mani
On 26.07.2014 19:17, Kevin Fenzi wrote Sorry for the long delay here. ;( There was a issue with the pkgdb2 api to do this, then I was traveling, etc. It's now been done. The following packages are looking for a new point of contact on at least one branch: (Note that many of them have co-maint

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-07-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:01:33 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:03:30 +0800 > Christopher Meng wrote: > > > My opinion is, you should only comaintain what you want, not take > > over other's packages. > > > > If FESCo member could give consent of adding someone as an admin(not >

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-06-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:03:30 +0800 Christopher Meng wrote: > My opinion is, you should only comaintain what you want, not take over > other's packages. > > If FESCo member could give consent of adding someone as an admin(not > the point of the contact) of a package instead of orphaning lots of >

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-06-27 Thread Christopher Meng
My opinion is, you should only comaintain what you want, not take over other's packages. If FESCo member could give consent of adding someone as an admin(not the point of the contact) of a package instead of orphaning lots of packages, that will be helpful. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@li

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-06-27 Thread Frantisek Kluknavsky
On 06/26/2014 10:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:19:32 +0200 Sandro Mani wrote: Hi, Given that no-one seems to know how to contact deji, I'd like to request the takeover of scotch. as a fesco member I can ack this. We will be orphaning his packages and you can pick up scot

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-06-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:19:32 +0200 Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi, > > Given that no-one seems to know how to contact deji, I'd like to > request the takeover of scotch. as a fesco member I can ack this. We will be orphaning his packages and you can pick up scotch. kevin signature.asc Descriptio

Re: Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-06-25 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi, Given that no-one seems to know how to contact deji, I'd like to request the takeover of scotch. Thanks, Sandro -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-06-19 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi, Given that Deji Akingunola is maintainer of a couple of high-profile packages, I'd like to double-check whether really no-one knows how to reach him. The packages he is maintainer for are: atlas babl bibletime cln clucene exaile exempi galternatives gegl gparted grads libctl libibverbs li

Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-06-13 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi, I've filed this bug [1] in scotch nearly one month ago, the issue being that the scotch libraries are under-linked and have undefined symbols. A tentative patch is attached in the BZ. Since this is a blocker for the salome packaging, I'd like to see this resolved. Attempts to contact dej

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola

2010-08-09 Thread Robert Scheck
Hello Deji, On Mon, 09 Aug 2010, Deji Akingunola wrote: > While the truth is you never contacted me by email, and you went ahead > threatening me with AWOL policy and orphaning all my packages just 2 > weeks after filing a bug for package upgrade on EPEL 4. thank you very much for your reply. In

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola

2010-08-09 Thread Christoph Wickert
Am Montag, den 09.08.2010, 09:46 -0400 schrieb Deji Akingunola: > While the truth is you never contacted me by email, and you went ahead > threatening me with AWOL policy and orphaning all my packages just 2 > weeks after filing a bug for package upgrade on EPEL 4. The truth is that the bug 60099

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola

2010-08-09 Thread Deji Akingunola
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Robert Scheck wrote: > Hi, > > as per non-responsive maintainer policy at > >  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers > > I have filed: > >  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600992 > > Does somebody know how to contact

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola

2010-08-08 Thread Till Maas
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 09:39:44PM +0200, Robert Scheck wrote: > Hi, > > as per non-responsive maintainer policy at > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers > > I have filed: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600992 Imho the bug report s

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola

2010-08-08 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > Robert Scheck wrote, at 08/09/2010 04:39 AM +9:00: >> Hi, >> as per non-responsive maintainer policy at >>     >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers >> >> I have filed: >>    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola

2010-08-08 Thread Mamoru Tasaka
Robert Scheck wrote, at 08/09/2010 04:39 AM +9:00: > Hi, > as per non-responsive maintainer policy at >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers > > I have filed: >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600992 > > Does somebody know how to contact D

Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola

2010-08-08 Thread Robert Scheck
Hi, as per non-responsive maintainer policy at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers I have filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600992 Does somebody know how to contact Deji Akingunola? I've been unsuccessful via e-mail and Red Hat Bugzi